Avernus Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 shoot.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubfoothead Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 A good reason to not simply slot TO in as the next pick in the CCS is because there are a few players I'd rather hanve than TO right now, and I'd bet that more than a couple other Culpepper voters feel the same way. I remember a couple of years ago when Skippy had more time, that he actually tracked the top four vote getters for each position, and some guys would be in the top four vote getters for like 6-8 picks, occasionally even dropping (ie, going from the second choice to the third or fourth choice) due to different people being online to vote at different parts of the process. FWIW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outshined Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 A good reason to not simply slot TO in as the next pick in the CCS is because there are a few players I'd rather hanve than TO right now, and I'd bet that more than a couple other Culpepper voters feel the same way. I remember a couple of years ago when Skippy had more time, that he actually tracked the top four vote getters for each position, and some guys would be in the top four vote getters for like 6-8 picks, occasionally even dropping (ie, going from the second choice to the third or fourth choice) due to different people being online to vote at different parts of the process. FWIW. 901334[/snapback] Good point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts