grgunderson

At the end of the day it was a trivial issue. They missed the window by 7 and some change hours. Had someone presented a valid argument, I might have pushed it through. The thing that really irked me was his rationale. He made a mistake by not checking/knowing the rules and his logic was: "The reason why you should expedite it is because I need him for tomorrow." No.

I was thinking the same thing.

and that too

I don't agree. The review period allows other owners the ability to veto in case of shady things like collusion. I think 2 days may be a bit much and will recommend it be reduced to one.

That has to be the reason why. It gives the other owners ample time to review the trade. It's unfortunate that his current TE was ruled out on Fri but they, manure happens.

It's Charles Clay for Melvin Gordon, so neither have played yet. I am assuming its saying tuesday bc the trade was made on Fri and ESPN's default rules say that it is a 2 day review period. So the trade would go through after the buffalo game started.

It's via ESPN and the rosters don't lock after thurs games, they lock @ the start of each game. He still has time to pick up someone off waiver before sun.

A trade was proposed in my league and is set to be processed on Tuesday, after Week 5's games. One of the owners is requesting that the LM expedite it so that he can play his acquisition on Sunday. Should it be expedited or should he have to wait? He doesn't have another player to replace him on his roster but he still can go to the waivers and play his new guy the following week.