cbraendle Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 is Steve Smith (NYG) for Anquan Boldin a fair trade? no ppr, and the guy who owns boldin has been benching him, probably because he owns and starts larry fitz. If not, i could include Darren Sproles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbraendle Posted October 1, 2009 Author Share Posted October 1, 2009 his is very deep at QB, pretty deep at RB (pierre thomas, marshawn lynch, cedric benson, ray rice), and actually pretty deep at WR, as well (boldin, fitz, welker, henderson, garcon). My other WR's are Brandon Marshall and Reggie Wayne we can start 2 RB's, 2 WR's and a RB/WR Flex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbcastello Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 steve smith has put up more points then boldin so keep steve smith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Medal of Honor Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 steve smith has put up more points then boldin so keep steve smith. That's possibly the worst advice I've ever heard. Just cause somebody has put up more points you keep them? You do realize the past does not dictate the future, right? Look, I for one do not believe the New York pass offense at all. The reason you've got Manningham and Smith putting up the numbers they are is because teams are putting 8 men in the box to stop Jacobs and have been forcing Eli to beat them in the air. Look for that to start to change starting this week. 6 or 7 men in the box and putting more guys in coverage. Smith is not anywhere NEAR the talent of Boldin. This is a no-brainer deal. Boldin is a proven outstanding talent. His small point yield in the first two weeks comes from a lingering injury that he's pretty much over now. Kurt Warner is 100 times the QB that Manning is. Do the deal. Don't look back. Boldin is going to catch fire in 1-2 weeks. Do not listen to jbcastello. He's trolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelman Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 (edited) steve smith has put up more points then boldin so keep steve smith. That's the worst advise i've ever heard too. I agree with All the reasons Medal of Honor listed. Edited October 1, 2009 by michaelman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbcastello Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 (edited) That's possibly the worst advice I've ever heard. Just cause somebody has put up more points you keep them? You do realize the past does not dictate the future, right? Look, I for one do not believe the New York pass offense at all. The reason you've got Manningham and Smith putting up the numbers they are is because teams are putting 8 men in the box to stop Jacobs and have been forcing Eli to beat them in the air. Look for that to start to change starting this week. 6 or 7 men in the box and putting more guys in coverage. Smith is not anywhere NEAR the talent of Boldin. This is a no-brainer deal. Boldin is a proven outstanding talent. His small point yield in the first two weeks comes from a lingering injury that he's pretty much over now. Kurt Warner is 100 times the QB that Manning is. Do the deal. Don't look back. Boldin is going to catch fire in 1-2 weeks. Do not listen to jbcastello. He's trolling. Do you have a problem with your ego there buddy? jesus i'm not trolling. Have you heard of breakout players? They're playing the chiefs! are you psycho? keep steve smith for atleast this week! cards are on their bye this week anyways! Phillys b ackup threw for 350+ yards against the chiefs!! and that was with Westbrook out! I'm not a complete idiot! And as you said past doesn't dictate the future.... so what if boldin doesn't do as well as he did in the past? Eli Manning could have a really good year. Kurt warner is on or off. Edited October 1, 2009 by jbcastello Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbraendle Posted October 1, 2009 Author Share Posted October 1, 2009 thanks guys. i'll see if he'll take steve smith and sproles for boldin. i hate having 2 starters on one team (jacobs and smith), and i'm sure he hates having boldin and fitz (autodraft). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbcastello Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 wait till next week tho bro boldin is NOT PLAYING THIS WEEK! Steve smith is!!! THATS WHY HE WANTS TO TRADE! Cardinals are on their bye! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbraendle Posted October 1, 2009 Author Share Posted October 1, 2009 i'm the one offering the trade, and i can just start someone else in place of smith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbcastello Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 they're playing the chiefs.. smith is in line for a big game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timbo Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 In the long run, Boldin is a far better choice. I think you are asking if the trade is fair and if anyone else in the league might object. Since the other guy also has Fitz, and the points are in favor of Smith right now, the trade is fair enough. I don't have your whole line up, but Sproles and Smith seems too much for Boldin. Hurry up though, the other teams may target Boldin soon also since he has Fitz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbraendle Posted October 1, 2009 Author Share Posted October 1, 2009 yea i'm gonna wait till next week and offer smith and sproles. at this point, sproles is my 5th string RB at best. i will not use him the rest of the season, unless LT is out and chargers play some absolutely horrible run defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.