Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

war on the rule of law


Azazello1313
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not bad until this:

 

Critics on the right accuse the administration of socialism, but its economic approach more closely resembles fascism properly understood — in which the means of production are privately owned but business decisions are centrally made through a policy of dirigisme. Socialism and fascism are incendiary words, tossed about by people who are upset that they have not gotten their way. That does not render them entirely inapplicable.

 

This kind of drivel betrays the complete lack of a proper frame of reference. Socialism and fascism are indeed incendiary words and the examples cited by the commentator have little or nothing to do with real socialism / fascism, thus they are entirely inapplicable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This kind of drivel betrays the complete lack of a proper frame of reference. Socialism and fascism are indeed incendiary words and the examples cited by the commentator have little or nothing to do with real socialism / fascism, thus they are entirely inapplicable.

 

I guess it depends how you define "real" socialism and facism. do you define them by their economic characteristics, or by their excesses and abuses? I thought he was pretty even-handed there, but I see your point. I agree they are prejudicial terms, almost always thrown about to inflame rather than explain. I did like his use of the more helpful term, dirigisme.

Edited by Azazello1313
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it depends how you define "real" socialism and facism. do you define them by their economic characteristics, or by their excesses and abuses? I thought he was pretty even-handed there, but I see your point. I agree they are prejudicial terms, almost always thrown about to inflame rather than explain. I did like his use of the more helpful term, dirigisme.

That's not too far from the inevitable truth.

 

generally designates a mainly capitalist economy with strong economic participation by government. Most modern economies can be characterized as dirigiste to some degree – for instance, state economic action may be exercised through subsidizing research and developing new technologies, or through government procurement, especially military (i.e. a form of mixed economy). China is the clearest example to date.

 

It's a question of degree (and the perception as to whether capitalism is fulfilling or failing the nation). In the 1990s that perception is likely widely divergent from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information