JoJoTheWebToedBoy Posted September 7, 2008 Share Posted September 7, 2008 I'm thinking a little of both.... Rams looked horrible. McNabb was on, and I love LJ this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 I say it's both....I've noticed the past few years that the Rams were more of a 2nd half team and the game was over by the half.... if anything...I'd buy low on SJax... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 Kinda both but mostly Rams are that bad IMO. Seemed like their OL was called for 100 penalties and gave Bulger no time whatsoever, at least based on what I saw. Also Linehan is easily one of the worst coaches around IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 Kinda both but mostly Rams are that bad IMO. Seemed like their OL was called for 100 penalties and gave Bulger no time whatsoever, at least based on what I saw. Also Linehan is easily one of the worst coaches around IMO. the fact that the Eagles have such a strong rotation on the front 4 allowed them to stay fresh late in the game...not to mention the secondary being as good as it is which allowed the speedy, young LB's to blitz... also I noticed Gaither and Bradley making some plays in the passing game as well... losing Orlando Pace didn't help either.....that OL was getting flurried all game... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSab Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 I only wish we played the Ram every week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.