kevinkris

I found this kind of strange also. I mean manning isn't what he once was, but Denver's D is still scary good, and we have seen many teams win championships with medicore QB's, and a strong defense. We did an office pool with 20 people, and you had to lay our the bracket before the wildcard games started. Not one person picked Denver to go to the SB! I was avoiding them as I assumed many would pick them, and wanted to have a chance to win it all and not split, but I didn't realize how much people thought they were going no where. Was very curious.

I actually don't understand why the Patriots are favoured, doesn't really make a lot of sense imo. Denver already beat them this season, and it's not like the Pats have been crushing teams the last half of the season. I agree though, it will be a close game where near the end one big play will probably decide the outcome, just like in both of the steelers games, a late fumble changing all the momentum.

yeah, i don't get how the hit on Wheaton is a helmet to helmet, but the hit on bernard isn't. I understand bernard "became a runner", but it is stupid. The receiver lowers his head, gets hit, it's helmet to helmet. the "runner" turns around and gets hit, but it isn't...

I feel ya, started ivory last week, got me zero so i sat him this week. Sucks:(

This is probably it. On a side note, the eagles have not looked good.

makes sense. Was surprised, didn't realize Chip was a fan, or commentator, favourite.

This may seem like a stupid comment, but how come Tirico and Gurden seem to be all over the Eagles nuts? Did I miss something?

Haven't posted here in a while, but I still visit throughout the year. I feel like why people think this is a form of "cheating" is because of the Pats shady past. If had it been in reverse, ie. Bal doing it to NE, people would be thinking of it more as a strategy and less of cheating. Regardless, I didn't hear it announced either and don't know enough about the rules to know if it is more shady or more genius.

That's true, still Foster has higher upside I feel. Still torn, anyone else?

I would drop Nicks or Eli and pick up Hyde.

Would you rather have: Brady and Le'von Bell or Romo and Foster Its a non PPR league, I also kave Kaep for QB. Both Bell/Foster would be my RB2 as I also have lacy.

Got morris in two leagues. he had a good game, but could have been so much better easily.

if you go off of some recent startup dynasty adp data, its like pick 9 for 37/42 and is actually a pretty close deal. While I wouldn't do it, if you were starting a youth movement and expected big things from Miller I could see why someone would trade.

Brees/Foster/Graham and for the fourth spot either nelson or sproles. I would probably go sproles as it is ppr

if you listed what it cost to keep each of your players, along with starting req it would be easier to determine. Because based on your post it seems it is a contract league? or you give up different picks based on which player you keep