Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Fins4Life

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Fan of the
    Dolphins

Profile Information

  • Location
    Denver, CO

Fins4Life's Achievements

Huddler

Huddler (2/4)

0

Reputation

  1. As much as I like Tebow and his inspirational play recently; this is a no-brainer, Romo is your choice for higher points this week.
  2. I am debating whether to drop Flacco and pick up Dalton for matchup purposes in my playoff game this week. My opponent has Brady. Help!!! LOL
  3. That's not a trade I would do; it weakens you at QB and WR in my opinion.
  4. I would not drop Bush for anyone on that list. Hang on to him and hope the coaching staff of the Dolphins get a clue about how to properly utilize his skills; which is as a slot receiver ala Wes Welker.
  5. Dude; you do know Charles is out for the season right?
  6. I am struggling with which one to start this week. Thoughts?
  7. Fins4Life

    Live Chat

    Has anybody ever used the Live Chat feature? I have tried to use it several times and nobody is ever in there? What exactly is it intended for? Can somebody shed some light on this subject please. Also, where does one wrtie to get support for this service? I haven't been able to find a support link. Thanks
  8. I disagree. Sometimes it is obvious if an owner hasn't got a clue as to a specific situation. If it's just going to be a free for all league where anything goes, then why have a LM to begin with? That's just wrong. Why would I "drop" a league I spent a lot of my own time to create? What would that resolve? I have dropped owners for not participating because it's not fair to other owners who do participate and manage their teams week in and week out.
  9. Just as an aside; collusion is NOT the only reason to veto a trade. If the trade creates an imbalance in the league or division, say because an owner does not know what they are doing, then that is also a reason to veto a trade to protect the integrity of the league.
  10. It depends who your other Wr's are..if you're strong there then I'd say go ahead.
  11. Don't know if I would do that. Nelson is just getting started and that Buffalo offense seems to be clicking well.
  12. Wow! Did I stir a hornets nest here? Talk about running the spectrum. For those of you who got personal; no need. I am not a "meddling" LM, just the opposite, ask my owners. I am about as fair a LM as there is; which is one of the reasons I asked for some "other" input. For the record, I was leaning towards no veto. I have been LM of this league for 8 years and some owners have come, and some owners have gone for one reason or another. But I always use the reasoning of how I would like to be treated. Thanks for all the input.
  13. I am a LM and I am in the process of evaluating a trade between two teams in my league. Team A: Trades D. Nelson (Bills), F. Davis (Redskins), D. Thomas (Dolphins) Team B: Trades J. Stewart (Panthers), H. Nicks (Giants), K. Winslow (Bucs) My inclination is that this is not an equitable trade. It appears, based on performance levels, that Team B ends up with significantly more porduction than Team A. I welcome some input in making this evaluation. Thx
  14. I have an opportunity to get M. Vick for B. Marshall... My other WR's are A. Johnson, Julio Jones, Lee Evans, and Malcolm Floyd
  15. I have Flacco, Newton, and Ryan as my QB's I would like to pick up an extra WR in the form of either B. Lloyd, or N. Burleson I am thinking of offering Flacco for Lloyd or Burleson in a trade. Thoughts?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information