trade_pro

I appreciate the input. According to NFL.com, the corrections came out on Wednesday, December 13th but ESPN published then sometime much later....after Thursday at the minimum. That's the issue. ESPN was slow getting the info out. Their screw up is causing the headache. Also, I contacted them and they could not say when they made the change to the scoring. In fact, they said they don't post all changes which seemed dumb to me. You either do all of them or none of them. Guys in the league so far are saying to make the corrections, but I'm still on the fence. Kinda like the rule in golf, play it where it lies.

My ESPN league was in the playoffs starting week 14. It's a 12 man head to head league, top 6 make the playoffs. Team 3 was playing team 6 in the first round of the playoff. Team 3 receives 5.01 points for being the top seed. The reason for the 0.01 point is to avoid ties in the playoffs as you can't score 0.01 points. After Monday night, the scores were 152.11 to 152.1. So the extra 0.01 saved a tie as designed. I explained to all that there could be point adjustments. I looked at the adjustments and saw no change through Thursday of last week, however now there was a change. I believe the issue is 2 yards were given to the Panther's defense for punt return yards(Panther's Def was on team 6) and we score special teams/defense so kick returns count toward points. Did anyone else see this change as its not listed on ESPN's score adjustments but I do see it on NFL? How would you handle this now that week 15 has already played out? I can change the teams to correct the situation...but is that the correct thing to do?

Hey, I know this is an odd question but do you know when you found out West was inactive? It has to do with waivers and pick up times in our league. I got a complainer. Very much appreciated. I'm on Central time. So if you could specify, Id appreciate it.

Bump

Who should i start? ESPN says Dalton Others websites say Wilson

They say Landry to get revis

Nfl chanbel has it as lead headline.

Brown is due but not sure if todays the day he pays the bill but if he caught 1 deep pass hed probably make your bonus. Landry more secure but Rishard has higher upside. Because of your scoring, i would think you go upside so I'd go Rishard and Brown. Rishard over Landry due to coverage.

Crabtree.

Lynch is probably going to be at least limited due to a hamstring issue. I wouldn't do it.

Which one? Wilson or Dalton?

Did anyone bring up the unfairness of the trades when they were made? As commish, I set a rule of 1 day protest for any trade. If anyone protests the trade, then we vote. If you are involved in the trade you dont get to vote. 12 man league. So basically if 5 people vote against the trade it is annulled. I do not vote. This way I can judge any discrepancies fairly. Also, we dont have any women in our league who would try to destroy it. In this case, hand their money back and wink at them. Its only polite to wink at b@$ches.

Actually last year nobody had under 100 yds of total offense in the regular season. I believe Carolina had 97 in the playoffs and lost like 27 to 16. I play in a similar type of league. Def= QB

AP only on that trade scenario. I think J. Hill will bounce back but would only offer one of your receivers(other than Megatron) since you are loaded there.

No we are limited to 3 RB per team.