sonnyrandle

I appreciate your candor Cory, but I echo Sharpie's sentiments. I use to trust the column as a guide as well, and used it as a tool for free agent acquisitions and trade evaluations. Sadly, this site, like many others, now panders to those that play weekly games of chance. I'll take that into consideration when my renewal notice arrives.

"The Bears RBs will be addressed in the Tuesday update. As a rule of thumb, most Sunday night game situations will not be heavily included in the Monday morning release. The weekly Tuesday update will help address these situations once we have a little better feel for what is happening." Excuse me for asking but why aren't Sunday night game situations included? Wouldn't it be better to time stamp updates and mention that the ratings do not reflect Sunday night games? This was a situation where a largely ineffective back was carted off the field and replaced by a back that was relatively effective. To suggest Langford is the #14 best running back and Howard isn't amongst the top 72 is beyond belief. I can't speak for all others but I'd much prefer quality information as opposed to information that is posted late on Sunday afternoons so as to meet a deadline.

My apologies in advance for the criticism, but The Huddle seriously needs to consider appointing someone else to write the RSCS. Without delving into all the positions and rankings, consider these two examples. In his week four analysis, Mr. Bonini has Jeremy Langford as the #14 rated running back and Thomas Rawls listed as #23. Their obvious replacements based on performance, Christine Michael is listed as #29, and Jordan Howard doesn't manage to break the top the top 72. Unfortunately, this column has gotten to be a joke. A very sad joke.