jdn4891 Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 Anderson is home against Pittsburgh , and Garrard is home against Buffalo. Seems like Anderson will be having a much tougher time playing Pitt. Neither are these guys are great q-back choices. Chad Pennington is available, and he's playing the jets. So, here's part 2, Is Pennington worth getting rid of either Garrard or Anderson? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdn4891 Posted September 13, 2008 Author Share Posted September 13, 2008 Anderson is home against Pittsburgh , and Garrard is home against Buffalo. Seems like Anderson will be having a much tougher time playing Pitt. Neither are these guys are great q-back choices. Chad Pennington is available, and he's playing the jets. So, here's part 2, Is Pennington worth getting rid of either Garrard or Anderson? BTTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdn4891 Posted September 13, 2008 Author Share Posted September 13, 2008 Need help with this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengal Fan Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 Need help with this one. I've got Garrard and Palmer. I thought about starting Garrard after Palmer's bad day at Baltimore, but Garrard's got three linemen out. In your case, though, Pittsburgh's blitzing may eat up Anderson, so I'd go with Garrard. i don't think Buffalo's defense is as aggressive. In my case, I'm going with Palmer because he played well against Tennessee last year with a more beat-up line. On the other hand, I WANT Cleveland to do well because I only have two receivers and Andre Johnson's game got cancelled. My other is Braylon Edwards.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.