Company of Heroes Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 I see Manningham as a sell high for a number of reasons, including: Eli's heel, return of Nicks, bobbling issues, possible return to running game. Bell has minimal value unless PT is injured. LJ has looked poor but is a decent buy low candidate mainly because his schedule has been tough but has some useable matchups in the remaining schedule. If I he doesn't pan out, no big loss. But, starting RBs that don't share are hard to come by. Cotchery and Manningham are ranked next to each other by the Huddle, and I think this is a bit of a wash. I don't see Edwards doing anything but helping free up Cotch more. Cotch has never failed to score less than 7 FF pts in a game this season. By acquiring Edwards, they might be making a commitment to keep the passing game active. I do lose some upside with Manningham, but I think he goes downhill from here. Thoughts? -Heroes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhoops Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Sure you are basically trading bench players for bench players. Kind of a wash. But LJ is better than Bell, even if Bell was healthy he's behind Thomas and Bush. But since Bell is injured I would think you'd need to offer more. Kind of a low move trading a injured player. Your league mates might call foul on that move. You might have to give up Brow/Moreno....although I wouldn't. Good Luck, see my post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeDoscuatro Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Hmm i wouldn't yet. I think the jets passing game is will be upgraded, I don't know if they will go with it 100%. IMO edwards main goal for the jets is to create space against DEF. Cotchery is not a star WR, where edwards might pull attention to the pass game allowing Lwash and thomas jones to run the ball more. Id keep super mario and bell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorilla Bigdogg Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 I see Manningham as a sell high for a number of reasons, including: Eli's heel, return of Nicks, bobbling issues, possible return to running game.Bell has minimal value unless PT is injured. LJ has looked poor but is a decent buy low candidate mainly because his schedule has been tough but has some useable matchups in the remaining schedule. If I he doesn't pan out, no big loss. But, starting RBs that don't share are hard to come by. Cotchery and Manningham are ranked next to each other by the Huddle, and I think this is a bit of a wash. I don't see Edwards doing anything but helping free up Cotch more. Cotch has never failed to score less than 7 FF pts in a game this season. By acquiring Edwards, they might be making a commitment to keep the passing game active. I do lose some upside with Manningham, but I think he goes downhill from here. Thoughts? -Heroes Do that deal now...yesterday. Cotch is, at worst, a #2 receiver and can play like a #1. People are worried about Braylon taking targets, but no one can deny the chemistry b/w Sanchez and Cotchery. Braylon's addition is only going to take pressure off of Cotchery. LJ is a buy low commodity and I think your analysis of Manningham is spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kzook76 Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 Manningham is coming back to earth. Bell is worhless with PT on the field. make the deal. Please answer mine regarding Trading for Brady. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.