S.Smith Giants for Slaton or Grant

[FBI]

What do you think? I have a stable of receivers R.Moss, OchoCinco, Walters, Burrelson, and Smith. I can only start 3 and I really need a 2nd running back because Julius Jones is too inconsistent. Should I trade Moss, OchoCinco or S.Smith (NYG)? I know I wont get much for Walter or Burrelson but they will still make a good 3rd receiver for me.

[vikingsfan11]

i would do it, i would def lean towards getting slaton over getting grant but you definitely need rbs if JJ is your second

 

http://imaginarygridiron.blogspot.com/ check out my new fantasy football blog

[gman62]

Slaton has the better playoff matchups

[Happy Hour]

You're trading the best WR in fantasy for RBs that haven't lived up to their expectations? Don't trade a stud (albeit a free stud if you got him from the wire like I did) for a player who should be playing better

 

look at mine http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?showtopic=302360

[vikingsfan11]

its looking like we do not agree much at all happy hour. But i definitely do not consider steve smith the best wr in fantasy (sure he may lead in points through 5 weeks, but since when is that how long a football season is). I think when you look fantasy points per position RB's are obviously better than wr's and with Moss Ocho cinco and burleson to pick up the slack i feel like you have to improve you rushing attack.

 

AND happy hour, he said at the end Ocho Cinco, Moss, or Stevey Smith...moss is certainly not performing his best, why not trade him then if it is about who is performing? (dont get me wrong id rather get rid of ssmith than moss all day)

 

http://imaginarygridiron.blogspot.com check out my new football blog