Pistol Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 KC D v Browns [ risky? ] or PIT D v Packers [ safer? Details: my opponent has Aaron Rodgers and Greg Jennings. Every time one of them scores, it’ll be a 12 point shift [ +6 for TD/ -6 against my PIT D ] - valid concern? Given the PIT D woes + my opponent’s two GB offensive players, does it make sense to avoid PIT D v Packers and go with the risk/reward of KC D v Browns? Thoughts anyone? TIA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 WOW, two absolutely horrid picks to choose from. Without Polamalu, Pitt is absolute only an average D, plying against a offensive powerhouse but I think it's your safest bet. Granted, the only positive for picking the KC D is that the score will be lower, if you get deductions for points allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pistol Posted December 20, 2009 Author Share Posted December 20, 2009 WOW, two absolutely horrid picks to choose from. Without Polamalu, Pitt is absolute only an average D, plying against a offensive powerhouse but I think it's your safest bet. Granted, the only positive for picking the KC D is that the score will be lower, if you get deductions for points allowed. HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for the sympathy, man... yeah... brutal. >> Negative points for offensive scores only. Positive points for INT, sacks and fumble recoveries. So yeah, a lower score helps. >> The twist here is that he's got Aaron Rodgers and Jennings.... AND... I have Driver [ !! ] Any one of them scores a TD, it's -6 points against my PIT D... Driver is a wash -6/+6. [ major sigh ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.