jackets77 Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 My Roster: QB: Ryan RBs: McCoy, Forte, Hillis, M.Bush, Cadillac, J.Starks WRs: AJ, CJ, Steve Smith (NYG), Mason, N.Washington TE: Winslow DST: Giants K: Bryant Trade Option 1: I trade Steve Smith and Hillis I receive R.White Trade Option 2: I trade Mason, Forte, Bush I receive Aaron Rodgers Option 3: Don't do anything. Just pick up a waiveer wire QB and play my QB position based on matchups and let the rest of my team carry me. Currently I'm at 4-2 in the league and tied for 2nd place. This is a PPR league with 1pt per reception, and the rest of the league is a standard scoring system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripleshot Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Trade Option 1: I trade Steve Smith and Hillis I receive R.White I'm not sure you could get the White owner to accept this trade. Trade Option 2: I trade Mason, Forte, Bush I receive Aaron Rodgers I'd like some of whatever you're smoking if you think this is even remotely feasible. Who is available at QB on your waiver wire? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackets77 Posted October 20, 2010 Author Share Posted October 20, 2010 Trade Option 1: The White owner wants Forte and Smith for White. I'm thinking of countering with Hillis and Smith, but wondering if it improves my team. Trade Option 2: The Rodgers owner has Kyle Orton on the bench and has won only 1 game so far this year. He's asking for Smith, Forte and Bush for Rodgers, and I'm thinking about countering with Mason, Forte and Bush. So a slightly different version of both these trades were offered to me and and I'm wondering if they are countering, accepting or just declining and sticking to me team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mstrofpuppts Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 I would consider option 1, I don't think option 2 is that great for you, your giving up alot of RBs when your RBs aren't really consistent anyway making you even thinner at that spot. do you really think Roders would make up for the loss? whos availble on the ww for you to get at RB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbwv Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Trade option 1 roddy improves your wr corps, i like your proposal over his request. see if you can swing the proposal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zing Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 DO trade #1 (forte/Smith for White) and forget about the other ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripleshot Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 DO trade #1 (forte/Smith for White) and forget about the other ones. Absolutely. Roddy White for Smith/Forte is a steal for you. You have enough RB depth still to situationally start at RB2, and can use a WR at flex every week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FARM_FROM_A_GURU Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 Actually i'd be the one to say stay and do no trade. Hit up the waiver wire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.