lewis_shaves Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 This is my very first posting on this forum and i do indeed need some help in deciding whether or not the following trade is actual. We have an 8 person PPR league and the trade involves a guy whos (7-1) with a guy whos (2-6). (7-1) Cam newton, Deandre Hopkins......for.......Phillip Rivers. (2-6) The only reason i really have a hard time is because they are ROOMMATES. Iam the league manager and i can veto the trade or allow it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazyascarl Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 It depends on their rosters/needs but that looks fair enough to me. I hate commissioners who veto... unless it's Peyton for cj2k or something really ridiculous who are you know what's in their best interest? Cam could totally turn it around and Hopkins is out performing Andre Johnson... i have absolute no issues with that trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewis_shaves Posted October 30, 2014 Author Share Posted October 30, 2014 yeah i just want to make sure that (2-6) dude isnt just dumping off players to his buddy for easier wins. trying to keep the league fair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gundo Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I'd much prefer cam/hopkins, but this isn't something you should veto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn5033 Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 There is absolutely nothing wrong with this trade. If the guy at 2-6 needs WR help than this is a good trade for him. Yes Rivers has been better but Cam can go off for 30pts any given week. Both teams are making a fair trade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kook0725 Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I never consider rosters for trades. Player for player, looks like a fair trade IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazyascarl Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I never consider rosters for trades. Player for player, looks like a fair trade IMO. This view makes no sense (in my opinion). If a team has a need, they will give up more than their fair share to fill that void.... sometimes sacrifices are made to round out a roster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kook0725 Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 When I consider trades for myself, the roster is everything to me. But to think about fairness of a trade and whether or not to veto it, I don't think rosters should matter. It should be even for both sides player for player. It's up to them if it works out for their team or not. That's just my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.