Cunning Runt Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Conwell esque guy. Is Gonzo or Gates a Conwell esque guy. LMAO, what and idiot. Hey dumbas-s, did you actually read my post? I said I would rather have my opponent play Colston as a WR than as a TE and leave the TE spot filled with someone like an Ernie Conwell. Where, pray tell, did I mention Gates or Gonzalez. So.... LMAO, methinks 'tis you that are the idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Hey dumbas-s, did you actually read my post? I said I would rather have my opponent play Colston as a WR than as a TE and leave the TE spot filled with someone like an Ernie Conwell. Where, pray tell, did I mention Gates or Gonzalez. So.... LMAO, methinks 'tis you that are the idiot. I got your point, you clearly missed mine. My point was, if not Colston, then Conwell esque. And I asked you is Gonzo or gates Conwell esqe, as both of those also line up wide like a WR, and are the main target for their team. I think anyone questioning this is bitter because they do not have Colston in their yahoo leagues. I have him in one and Im riding him at Te, and I dont in the other, and wish I had him at TE in that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooGie Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I got your point, you clearly missed mine. My point was, if not Colston, then Conwell esque. And I asked you is Gonzo or gates Conwell esqe, as both of those also line up wide like a WR, and are the main target for their team. I think anyone questioning this is bitter because they do not have Colston in their yahoo leagues. I have him in one and Im riding him at Te, and I dont in the other, and wish I had him at TE in that one. How shameful of us to use strategy to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 How shameful of us to use strategy to win. Yep, and Im going to take every legal advanatage I can. if yahoo or whoever lists a player at an advantageous position, Im going to start him there. End of story. and no one in my leagues have said a word and if they did. tough sh**t. I dont have anything to do with what Yahoo does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cunning Runt Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 I got your point, you clearly missed mine. My point was, if not Colston, then Conwell esque. And I asked you is Gonzo or gates Conwell esqe, as both of those also line up wide like a WR, and are the main target for their team. I think anyone questioning this is bitter because they do not have Colston in their yahoo leagues. I have him in one and Im riding him at Te, and I dont in the other, and wish I had him at TE in that one. I completely agree. If I had him and could play him at TE, without a doubt that's where I'd play him. My initial post was as a reply to someone previously who said they would want their opponent to play his best lineup against him, so I replied that no, not me, if my opponent had the choice, I would prefer he played Colston at WR, not TE so he would have to fill his TE position with someone much lesser (here's where I used the Conwell reference as an example). My bad if we got sideways, but I'm not a big fan of being called an idiot, as I'm sure most of us are not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.