Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Need Opinions on a League Dispute


gardenthug
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is a 10 team league with a $200 buy in. Like most leagues, we have a 24-48 hr trade approval period, so that shady trades or cheating can be prevented. This year we've had a few trades get approved after a little less than 24 hrs, but only b/c they were vanilla or had been discussed on the chat board. The commish has the power to push thru a trade.

Here's the scenario, last night the commish made a rather lopsided trade with another member of the league. The trade occured after midnight and was approved before anyone in our league got on the computer this morning. Other managers started questioning the trade and why the guy would trade his top 2 picks to the commish for pretty midlevel talent. The guy then admited that he was drunk last night and he thought he had rejected, not accepted the trade.

If the trade hadn't been pushed thru so quickly by the commish, it probably would've been rejected when all the league members figured out what had happened. What do we do now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you have 24-48 hrs to vote yes or no? if so, then how can it be pushed thru without approval. the only reason the commish should push thru a trade if it's made late sat. night and there isn't a 24 hr window for voting. then all owners should be contacted about it. i think it should be reversed...if a league vote is required to approve a trade. if not...don't let friends run their team drunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you have 24-48 hrs to vote yes or no? if so, then how can it be pushed thru without approval. the only reason the commish should push thru a trade if it's made late sat. night and there isn't a 24 hr window for voting. then all owners should be contacted about it. i think it should be reversed...if a league vote is required to approve a trade. if not...don't let friends run their team drunk.

 

 

Our league uses the grace period to dispute trades, not approve. Trades don't have to be approved to be pushed thru, but the league rules state a 24-48hr grace period should apply to all trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our league uses the grace period to dispute trades, not approve. Trades don't have to be approved to be pushed thru, but the league rules state a 24-48hr grace period should apply to all trades.

so basically even if all owners thought a trade was bogus it would still get approved? if i'm understanding this right, why is there even a grace period? as long as there's no collusion...then i don't see what you can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the commish pushed it through manually - not subjecting it to the "grace" period. That's a BS move on your commish's part and it sounds like he pushed it through because he knew it was lopsided to his own personal advantage and abused his commish authority big time.

 

That's cheating in my book and he does not deserve the trust/confidence which was bestowed upon him.

Edited by Cunning Runt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so basically even if all owners thought a trade was bogus it would still get approved? if i'm understanding this right, why is there even a grace period? as long as there's no collusion...then i don't see what you can do.

 

He is saying the trade involved the commish who has (and did) push the trade through without any grace period.

Edited by Chloroform Rx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your rules state there needs to be a minimum of 24 hours before a trade can be put through, but you're saying the Commish put his own trade through sooner. This means he broke the rules and must either reverse the trade and follow the rules, or doing nothing and be a cheat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's BS if the rules state a waiting period as you say.

 

Try to find a better league next year, or a better commish anyway. It's one thing to propose a trade as a joke, quite another to push it through as commish, even if it was within the rules. If the guy says he thought he pressed reject, I think on a trade like that you give the benefit of the doubt given the instantaneous nature of the web-based league management in use these days.

 

While it helps to try to cover various scenarios in the rules, I would expect people to also adhere to the spirit of the rules, not try to get ahead on some technicality or mistake. When the person attempting that is actually the commish, it does not bode well for the league as a whole, methinks.

 

It's not like we're talking about a free league here; this is $200 buy-in, pretty serious stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a 10 team league with a $200 buy in. Like most leagues, we have a 24-48 hr trade approval period...
So which is it, 24 or 48?
This year we've had a few trades get approved after a little less than 24 hrs, but only b/c they were vanilla or had been discussed on the chat board. The commish has the power to push thru a trade.
Apparently it's neither.

 

IMO, you either have a rule or you don't and it looks like you don't really have a rule, just a general understanding that can be ignored by the commish if he chooses. The rules should be explicit - immediate execution, 24 hours, 48 hours, whatever - then adhere to the rules.

 

The trade occured after midnight and was approved before anyone in our league got on the computer this morning. Other managers started questioning the trade and why the guy would trade his top 2 picks to the commish for pretty midlevel talent. The guy then admited that he was drunk last night and he thought he had rejected, not accepted the trade.
IMO the guy either made a dumb move and is trying to blame it on alcohol or really was drunk and now sees that others may save him. Either way it wasn't collusion, just somebody making a bad move. Many people here seem to believe, and I agree, that trades should only be reversed if there's collusion.
What do we do now?
Decide on a rule and follow it.

 

FWIW - I think the commish should always strive to make the game fair for everyone and above all, always make sure that his own transactions are completely above reproach. I'm not sure I would trust your current commish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information