whitem0nkey Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 (edited) 1 point per 10 yards and .5 per catch, 6pt per TD. thanks Edited September 22, 2005 by whitem0nkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhayhurst Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 I voted yes b/c I am assuming you are the commish and that you are vetoing the trade and wanted advise. But, If you have Droughns and are trading to get R. Wayne then by all means do the trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitem0nkey Posted September 22, 2005 Author Share Posted September 22, 2005 (edited) yep thats what is going on, we had a person not show up for the draft so we made a fantasy team that is all Chicago bears(since we are all in Chicago), just so we have a competitive team all but one week, so i need a vote for that team, since im makeing the trade. Edited September 22, 2005 by whitem0nkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 yep thats what is going on, we had a person not show up for the draft so we made a fantasy team that is all Chicago bears(since we are all in Chicago), just so we have a competitive team all but one week 1010971[/snapback] I don't see what that has to do with Droughns or Wayne, but if theor's no collusion then you should allow the trade. What are the rb's of the guy getting rid of Wayne? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaronvh Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 What the hell is going on here? If you are missing a player you don't make a team of crappy players. Thats just dumb. You have the odd man out play the league average score. Drougans for Wayne is really retar ded but so what. I hate the whole veto this trade thing, if 2 people are willing to trade then let them, who cares if the Wayne owner is stupid. Now if it was week 11 or 12 and people are padding teams to split pots and all that shaddy crap then I can understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitem0nkey Posted September 22, 2005 Author Share Posted September 22, 2005 I don't see what that has to do with Droughns or Wayne, but if theor's no collusion then you should allow the trade. What are the rb's of the guy getting rid of Wayne? 1010991[/snapback] W. Dunn F. Taylor C. Portis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickerson Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 Wayne for Droughns could possibly be fair if the guy trading wayne has Moss, Owens and C Johnson as his starting 3, and Holt as #4 and Wayne is his #5 WR... his RB's would have to be Barry Sanders and Eric Dickerson..., and he has tried everyone else in the league, and the only RB available is Droughns... Nah, still too lopsided, but ya can't veto a trade just because someone is stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitem0nkey Posted September 23, 2005 Author Share Posted September 23, 2005 just a bump to get some more vote,from the later crowd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted September 23, 2005 Share Posted September 23, 2005 W. Dunn F. Taylor C. Portis 1011005[/snapback] The guy's a Oprahking idiot, but you still let the trade go through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.