typhus Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 (edited) Since Scott is and will continue to be an intriguing play, since in many leagues he is considered a DB but has been moved to LB. So knowing that, for comparison sake lets take a look at his relative value vs Brain Dawkins. I chose Dawkins for a comparison because he has a great matchup week 14 vs INDY. Scotts biggest value IMO is the stability factor he will bring in his scoring during those crucial playoff weeks, in which every point will be critical, and since he is playing WLB, will get you the consistant tackles. Would you rather role with the great matchup (Dawkins), or play it safe with Scott? Again, this isnt a WDIS question, but rather a discussion in review between what other owners feel is the more rational approach..... potential meaga points (Dawkins) vs tricky yet safe (Scott). Edited December 4, 2009 by typhus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 fwiw Dawkins is also QUESTIONABLE with an ankle injury so you need to factor that in also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
typhus Posted December 14, 2009 Author Share Posted December 14, 2009 fwiw Dawkins is also QUESTIONABLE with an ankle injury so you need to factor that in also Glad I stayed with Scott,,,, guy put up huge numbers week 14,,,, but so did Dawkins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.