What Percentage Of Vetos Would You Need To Nix A Deal?

[the lone star]

What Percentage Of Vetos (from the entire league) Would You Need To Nix A Deal? Assume you are in a league where trades are put up to a vote.

 

Scenario 1: 12 Team League
Scenario 2: 14 Team League
Scenario 3: 16 Team League

 

Please keep in mind that you HAVE to pick a number. Saying that you wouldn't play in a league with this kind of set-up isn't an option here.

Edited March 9, 2019 by the lone star

[michaelredd9]

I believe in trade vetoes.  Most on this message board don't believe in vetoes.  They believe in a dog-eat-dog fantasy world.  I believe vetoes help protect the integrity of the league.  But I prefer to have the commissioner have veto power.  Democracy and fantasy football don't mix well.  Most leagues have 4 to 6 members who are somewhat dumb.   Or at least they don't fully understand football.  Some leagues also have unsavory types who will veto because the trade benefits both teams.  An honorable, knowledgeable commissioner is far more trustworthy than the masses.  Dictatorship for the proletariat not dictatorship of the proletariat.

 

[League_Champion]

13 hours ago, michaelredd9 said:

I believe in trade vetoes.  Most on this message board don't believe in vetoes.  They believe in a dog-eat-dog fantasy world.  I believe vetoes help protect the integrity of the league.  But I prefer to have the commissioner have veto power.  Democracy and fantasy football don't mix well.  Most leagues have 4 to 6 members who are somewhat dumb.   Or at least they don't fully understand football.  Some leagues also have unsavory types who will veto because the trade benefits both teams.  An honorable, knowledgeable commissioner is far more trustworthy than the masses.  Dictatorship for the proletariat not dictatorship of the proletariat.

 

 

I totally agree. I've seen friendships lost over shady Fantasy deals, especially when money is on the line. 

[the lone star]

15 hours ago, michaelredd9 said:

I believe in trade vetoes.  Most on this message board don't believe in vetoes.  They believe in a dog-eat-dog fantasy world.  I believe vetoes help protect the integrity of the league.  But I prefer to have the commissioner have veto power.  Democracy and fantasy football don't mix well.  Most leagues have 4 to 6 members who are somewhat dumb.   Or at least they don't fully understand football.  Some leagues also have unsavory types who will veto because the trade benefits both teams.  An honorable, knowledgeable commissioner is far more trustworthy than the masses.  Dictatorship for the proletariat not dictatorship of the proletariat.

 

 

I probably should have included commissioner veto as an option, but I did want to focus on just a league-wide vote setting. Thank you for your input though, I greatly appreciate it.