Sign in to follow this  
the lone star

What Percentage Of Vetos Would You Need To Nix A Deal?

What Percentage Of Vetos (from the entire league) Would You Need To Nix A Deal?  

6 members have voted

  1. 1. What Percentage Of Vetos (from the entire league) Would You Need To Nix A Deal?

    • 1 - 25%
      0
    • 26 - 49%
      0
    • 50%
      0
    • 51 - 66%
    • 66.67%
    • 67 - 74%
      0
    • 75%
    • 76 - 89%
      0
    • 90 - 100%


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What Percentage Of Vetos (from the entire league) Would You Need To Nix A Deal? Assume you are in a league where trades are put up to a vote.

 

Scenario 1: 12 Team League
Scenario 2: 14 Team League
Scenario 3: 16 Team League

 

Please keep in mind that you HAVE to pick a number. Saying that you wouldn't play in a league with this kind of set-up isn't an option here.

Edited by the lone star

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe in trade vetoes.  Most on this message board don't believe in vetoes.  They believe in a dog-eat-dog fantasy world.  I believe vetoes help protect the integrity of the league.  But I prefer to have the commissioner have veto power.  Democracy and fantasy football don't mix well.  Most leagues have 4 to 6 members who are somewhat dumb.   Or at least they don't fully understand football.  Some leagues also have unsavory types who will veto because the trade benefits both teams.  An honorable, knowledgeable commissioner is far more trustworthy than the masses.  Dictatorship for the proletariat not dictatorship of the proletariat.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, michaelredd9 said:

I believe in trade vetoes.  Most on this message board don't believe in vetoes.  They believe in a dog-eat-dog fantasy world.  I believe vetoes help protect the integrity of the league.  But I prefer to have the commissioner have veto power.  Democracy and fantasy football don't mix well.  Most leagues have 4 to 6 members who are somewhat dumb.   Or at least they don't fully understand football.  Some leagues also have unsavory types who will veto because the trade benefits both teams.  An honorable, knowledgeable commissioner is far more trustworthy than the masses.  Dictatorship for the proletariat not dictatorship of the proletariat.

 

 

I totally agree. I've seen friendships lost over shady Fantasy deals, especially when money is on the line. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, michaelredd9 said:

I believe in trade vetoes.  Most on this message board don't believe in vetoes.  They believe in a dog-eat-dog fantasy world.  I believe vetoes help protect the integrity of the league.  But I prefer to have the commissioner have veto power.  Democracy and fantasy football don't mix well.  Most leagues have 4 to 6 members who are somewhat dumb.   Or at least they don't fully understand football.  Some leagues also have unsavory types who will veto because the trade benefits both teams.  An honorable, knowledgeable commissioner is far more trustworthy than the masses.  Dictatorship for the proletariat not dictatorship of the proletariat.

 

 

I probably should have included commissioner veto as an option, but I did want to focus on just a league-wide vote setting. Thank you for your input though, I greatly appreciate it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.