steeler Posted December 21, 2004 Share Posted December 21, 2004 Manning has a history of failing fantasy owners who leaned on him during the regular season into the playoffs.623697[/snapback] This is just dumb. When you use the phrase; "has a history", you imply that he's somehow affected by the fact that it's the FF playoffs. So be extrapolation, you are saying that people shouldn't rely on Manning during next year's playoffs because of his "history". Is this what you are trying to say? Because it's dumb. If not, please explain it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jrick35 Posted December 21, 2004 Share Posted December 21, 2004 Actually Manning's, low for him but good for most, 18.25 points was enough for me to win by 2.55 points, so I guess when he was down the rest of my team was strong enough to pick him up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cunning Runt Posted December 21, 2004 Share Posted December 21, 2004 There are too many teams that got to the playoffs based on Manning alone. If your team relies on one guy to win games, maybe you aren't as good as you think you are. Same thing with Holmes. The guy that has had Holmes in our league has made and then tanked the playoffs three years running! 622438[/snapback] Better still, the #1 overall team in our league had both Manning AND Holmes as his top players. Fitting that he should get beat this week by a much lower seeded team. I love it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.