Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Keeper Help


kw_gullatt06
 Share

Recommended Posts

Would need lineup reqs and scoring intricacies (ie PPR, unusual yardage, etc.) to give decent advice.

 

Absent that, I'd lean Rivers/Gore but I'd prefer to be able to wait until preseason to see how Gore is recovering before committing to him. If he appears slowed or that the injury is persisting, than SJax likely gets the nod

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would need lineup reqs and scoring intricacies (ie PPR, unusual yardage, etc.) to give decent advice.

 

Absent that, I'd lean Rivers/Gore but I'd prefer to be able to wait until preseason to see how Gore is recovering before committing to him. If he appears slowed or that the injury is persisting, than SJax likely gets the nod

 

1qb

2rbs

flex

2 wrs

1 te

Dst

K

 

standard scoring

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming 12 or less teams, and assuming that Gore is back healthy, I could see valid arguments being made for keeping your top 3 RBs (CJ, Gore, SJax) and then AJ and Nicks.

 

 

With Rivers, while you are locking in a decent QB, if we look at the stats, yet again we see how much parity there is in QB scoring (using the PPG Huddle Performance Scoring). If we exclude Vick as an outlier (he scored 5 PPG more than the #2 QB), there was a difference of about 4 PPG between the top QBs 9Rodgers/Manning) and the #12 QB (Fitzpatrick/Garrard/Kitna), with Rivers pretty much right in the middle with a 2PPG advantage over those Qbs in the 12th QB range.

 

Looking at RBs, there is almost double the difference from 1-24 as there is in QBs (even if we exclude Arian Foster as on outlier being 3 PPG better than #2), with about a 7PPG spread.

 

 

Doesn;t seem like a hugh difference, but when you consider that the next 11 QBs (13-23) were all within 2 PPG of those guys in the #12 range, while you see ANOTHER 6-7 PPG drop for Rbs in the next batch, you see that it is much safer to load up on the RBs and address QB later. Assuming your RBs perform as expected, you can expect a much greater advantage overall even if you are starting a Cassel/Flacco type QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming 12 or less teams, and assuming that Gore is back healthy, I could see valid arguments being made for keeping your top 3 RBs (CJ, Gore, SJax) and then AJ and Nicks.

 

 

With Rivers, while you are locking in a decent QB, if we look at the stats, yet again we see how much parity there is in QB scoring (using the PPG Huddle Performance Scoring). If we exclude Vick as an outlier (he scored 5 PPG more than the #2 QB), there was a difference of about 4 PPG between the top QBs 9Rodgers/Manning) and the #12 QB (Fitzpatrick/Garrard/Kitna), with Rivers pretty much right in the middle with a 2PPG advantage over those Qbs in the 12th QB range.

 

Looking at RBs, there is almost double the difference from 1-24 as there is in QBs (even if we exclude Arian Foster as on outlier being 3 PPG better than #2), with about a 7PPG spread.

 

 

Doesn;t seem like a hugh difference, but when you consider that the next 11 QBs (13-23) were all within 2 PPG of those guys in the #12 range, while you see ANOTHER 6-7 PPG drop for Rbs in the next batch, you see that it is much safer to load up on the RBs and address QB later. Assuming your RBs perform as expected, you can expect a much greater advantage overall even if you are starting a Cassel/Flacco type QB.

 

thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information