Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Got one for the lawyers.


skylive5
 Share

Recommended Posts

In one of the Nero Wolfe shows a point about obstruction of justice is brought up.

 

If you have knowledge that will convict a person and withhold it..that is obstruction of justice.

 

If you have knowledge that a person is innocent and withhold it... is that obstruction?

(You don't know who did it...but you do have proof that the person the police have in custody didn't do it.)

 

Has this ever been raised judiciously? Are you guilty of obstruction of justice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*sigh*

 

Why is it that whenever I break down and ask lawyers a question they are all on vacation?

 

The resident physco.....therapist is always here. The resident gyno is always here. The resident auto mechanic is always here. The lawyers ... not so much I guess. Either that or they are checking with their own lawyer about the legalities of answering the question..... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have knowledge that will convict a person and withhold it..that is obstruction of justice.

 

If you have knowledge that a person is innocent and withhold it... is that obstruction?

(You don't know who did it...but you do have proof that the person the police have in custody didn't do it.)

 

Has this ever been raised judiciously? Are you guilty of obstruction of justice?

 

technically, there's no distinction. but practically.....well, think of it this way, who's gonna prosecute you for obstruction? right, the same folks who are prosecuting the person in the main case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

technically, there's no distinction. but practically.....well, think of it this way, who's gonna prosecute you for obstruction? right, the same folks who are prosecuting the person in the main case.

 

Why wouldn't there be a distiction?

 

I know something that will convict someone.... everyone knows I know.... I refuse to talk..... I am obstructing justice.

 

I know something that will release someone in custody... I don't know who the actual person is that did the crime... I don't like the guy they are trying to pin it on.... everyone knows I can get this guy released... I refuse to talk. No obstruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't there be a distiction?

 

I know something that will convict someone.... everyone knows I know.... I refuse to talk..... I am obstructing justice.

 

I know something that will release someone in custody... I don't know who the actual person is that did the crime... I don't like the guy they are trying to pin it on.... everyone knows I can get this guy released... I refuse to talk. No obstruction.

Why do you hate Michael Vick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't there be a distiction?

 

I know something that will convict someone.... everyone knows I know.... I refuse to talk..... I am obstructing justice.

 

I know something that will release someone in custody... I don't know who the actual person is that did the crime... I don't like the guy they are trying to pin it on.... everyone knows I can get this guy released... I refuse to talk. No obstruction.

 

well, you're presenting two totally separate situations. to compare apples to apples:

 

I know something that will convict someone.... everyone knows I know.... I refuse to talk..... I am obstructing justice.

I know something that will prove someone innocent.... everyone knows I know.... I refuse to talk..... I am obstructing justice.

 

but basically you only get charged with obstruction of justice if you somehow try and actively thwart an ongoing investigation (at the investigative stage, not so much at trial) -- technically, this applies to evidence that is exculpatory toward any particular party just as it does to info that is damning. however, if everyone knows you know, you'll probably get subpoenaed as a witness anyway. if you don't have a valid reason for not talking (like the 5th amendment privilege), then you get charged with contempt of court, not obstruction of justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, you're presenting two totally separate situations. to compare apples to apples:

 

I know something that will convict someone.... everyone knows I know.... I refuse to talk..... I am obstructing justice.

I know something that will prove someone innocent.... everyone knows I know.... I refuse to talk..... I am obstructing justice.

 

but basically you only get charged with obstruction of justice if you somehow try and actively thwart an ongoing investigation (at the investigative stage, not so much at trial) -- technically, this applies to evidence that is exculpatory toward any particular party just as it does to info that is damning. however, if everyone knows you know, you'll probably get subpoenaed as a witness anyway. if you don't have a valid reason for not talking (like the 5th amendment privilege), then you get charged with contempt of court, not obstruction of justice.

 

That would work. You are not obstructing justice... but you are in contempt. I can buy that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information