Bill Swerski Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 Need to fill out my #3 WR/TE spot. Typical performance scoring... Burress vs. the GB corners (Harris/Woodson) with Eli at < 100% Muhammad vs. Chiefs with another unfavorable CB matchup (Law or Surtain) that may get better as the day goes on (Chiefs D on the field all game) Clark @ Titans Davis @ Rams (hesitant to start him until he does something) I'm actually leaning towards Clark, but it's more of a gut feeling than anything else. Thanks in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 Wow, toughie. I would say that WR > TE unless otherwise, and see no reason to except that here. I'd give Muhammad a try as the Bears O bounces back vs the Chiefs. Nothing great but maybe a cheap td and 60 yds or so. Unless you want to roll the bones - Burress can dominate when he feels like it, and you never know when that's going to happen. The fact he showed up last week sorta makes me think he'll be a turd sandwich this week, though. I'd go with Moose, but if you feel lucky Plax isn't the worst idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted September 16, 2007 Author Share Posted September 16, 2007 Agreed about the WR > TE axiom. I've been drafting/managing by my gut successfully so far this year, but that luck won't last forever. I think that Muhammad's career is quickly winding down, but he probably has the best chance of scoring today. I remember TEN playing their safeties back about 15 yds from the line of scrimmage during their first matchup with IND last year, but after going back and looking at the box score, Clark still didn't do much. So Mush-head it is. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 I would go Burress myself. I think he gets a lot of looks no matter who is the QB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted September 16, 2007 Author Share Posted September 16, 2007 I would go Burress myself. I think he gets a lot of looks no matter who is the QB. I'd probably start Burress if he wasn't facing the Packers. They held Reggie Brown to like two receptions last week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 I'd probably start Burress if he wasn't facing the Packers. They held Reggie Brown to like two receptions last week. Well, comparing Burress to Reggie Brown is like comparing Tony Romo to David Garrard. They're barely playing the same sport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 I'd probably start Burress if he wasn't facing the Packers. They held Reggie Brown to like two receptions last week. Reggie Brown is know for zeroes though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.