LayLow Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 Standard scoring and the rest of my team is in my Sig. Mccoy could be a huge factor down the stretch...and then again he may not be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lackey Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 While I like Rice over McCoy, I'm not sure I would take this as you are already thin at wr and this would leave you even worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayLow Posted October 9, 2009 Author Share Posted October 9, 2009 Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayLow Posted October 9, 2009 Author Share Posted October 9, 2009 bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbraendle Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 how is getting Housh for Jennings leaving you thin at WR? i'd do this trade in a heartbeat. Jennings and Housh is basically a wash, but Rice is a large upgrade over McCoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddahj Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 i'd also do this trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Smales Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 how is getting Housh for Jennings leaving you thin at WR? i'd do this trade in a heartbeat. Jennings and Housh is basically a wash, but Rice is a large upgrade over McCoy +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayLow Posted October 9, 2009 Author Share Posted October 9, 2009 I havn't been starting Mccoy. the other owner has Westy. The Pontiff's Current Team QB-Rivers WR-Calvin Johnson WR-Greg Jennings RB-Moreno RB-Julius Jones TE-Witten Flex-LT K-Kaeding D-SF D Bench:D Ward, McFadden, Mccoy, Hightower, Lav Coles, Big Ben, M Goodson After Trade Rivers Calvin Housh Moreno Rice Witten LT Bench: Hightower, J Jones, B Wells Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Company of Heroes Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 I do see Rice as an improvement over McCoy. But I don't see that Jennings and Housh are a wash. And I don't see the upgrade at RB worth the downgrade at WR. Some things: -You'd be selling low on Jennings. I think they will work to find him the ball more coming out of the BYE, as you posted elsewhere. -Housh is trending upward, but there are still big questions in SEA. Namely the health of Hass and recent success of Burleson and even Branch and Carlson sporadically. -If you are giving McCoy to the Westy owner, you need to base the trade on McCoy's value to the new owner, not his value to you. -Considering your need at RB, I'd be more apt to trade Jennings for Westy straight up. or Jennings/JJones for Westy/Housh (or other decent WR). - You have tons of lower tier RBs that are not likely to offer much in the near term if at all (DMC, Goodson,Ward). Anyway to add some upside depth at WR instead via free agency or trade? Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayLow Posted October 9, 2009 Author Share Posted October 9, 2009 He won't do Jennings for Westy. These guys value their players early on by where they drafted them instead of what their actual current value is. Some other shlub said "jennings and moreno for Jacobs and burleson" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 Personally, the guy is light in the load if he's trading his handcuff. Westy will be hurt, again and McCoy is a solid runner and will be the starting back eventually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayLow Posted October 9, 2009 Author Share Posted October 9, 2009 He is trying to get McCoy from me. he has Westy That is the thing I can't get over. If McCoy ever starts a game (due to westy injury) he is a RB2 instantly regardless of matchup. Rice is basically a RB2 now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 For some reason I always read these wrong. You have the advantage here and Jennings will perform, eventually. I think Hous is a waiste of receiver air so the current trade looks ugly to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Company of Heroes Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 "jennings and moreno for Jacobs and burleson" Call me crazy, but that deal is closer than the one you are considering. I see Jacobs as a reasonable buy-low candidate, especially if there was someway you could get Bradshaw as well. When trading one under-performer (Jennings) for another (Jacobs), I don't worry so much about the selling low. The Huddle seems pretty high on Nate Burleson (top 20WR), but I think the jury is still out on him moving forward. Also, if you did that, you might consider McCoy for Housh. Then you'd be covered if one of the SEA WRs take the lead. -Heroes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayLow Posted October 9, 2009 Author Share Posted October 9, 2009 For some reason I always read these wrong. You have the advantage here and Jennings will perform, eventually. I think Hous is a waiste of receiver air so the current trade looks ugly to me. Ok. thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayLow Posted October 9, 2009 Author Share Posted October 9, 2009 Call me crazy, but that deal is closer than the one you are considering. I see Jacobs as a reasonable buy-low candidate, especially if there was someway you could get Bradshaw as well. When trading one under-performer (Jennings) for another (Jacobs), I don't worry so much about the selling low. The Huddle seems pretty high on Nate Burleson (top 20WR), but I think the jury is still out on him moving forward. Also, if you did that, you might consider McCoy for Housh. Then you'd be covered if one of the SEA WRs take the lead. -Heroes Don't want to move moreno for possible keeper value. Also, dude won't trade jacobs for jennings without a RB in return and moreno is only guy he would want. I am probably going to stay as I am right now. Thanks guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.