dsagen Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 Are the Lions D for real, or was it just the Rams were that bad? I picked up the Lions to replace the Steelers D and now I have a dilemna on my hands. I can drop the Steelers D right now, and grab Ben Tate off the FREE AGENT LIST, but I would have to ride out with the Lions D every week. I lost Mark Clayton and need a WR bad. Any thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carsonulrich Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 Are the Lions D for real, or was it just the Rams were that bad? I picked up the Lions to replace the Steelers D and now I have a dilemna on my hands. I can drop the Steelers D right now, and grab Ben Tate off the FREE AGENT LIST, but I would have to ride out with the Lions D every week. I lost Mark Clayton and need a WR bad. Any thoughts? Giving up PIT DEF for DET would be a huge mistake. Of the three options, keeping both DEF for matchup advantages or just keeping PIT DEF would be the preferred option. DET is on the road against NYG, playing well above expectations and PIT is past it's bye at home hosting CLE. Where is the upside in dropping PIT, easily one of the top 3 DEF right now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
injendsm Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 The Lions D is playing better than they have but they're still young and a work in progress. Stick with Pitt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildbluefan Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 No freekin' way JOSE....don't do it !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojo chiefs Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 Gota be a joke! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.