Trade offer - NON-PPR

[BearBroncos]

We can start 2 QB's and I currently have Freeman, Fitz and Vick. I plan on keeping Vick and potentially either Freeman or Fitz and I'm leaning towards Freeman for his consistency.

 

I was offered Cutler and Lynch for Blount and Freeman. I would normally jump at this but more nervous about Blount and Lynch. I honestly think Blount will be the better back. I currently have at RB Wells (which will now produce like he should), Greene, Mathews, Charles and Blount.

 

If Cutler can get his crap together, he could make my team unbeatable with Vick as the other QB. But, right now, Cutler is more a liability. Granted, I can start Fitz opposite of Vick the remainder of the year and I think I'll get plenty of points but I surely want a solid #3 QB with the potential of Vick re-injuring those ribs.

 

In short, should I accept the trade for Cutler and Lynch for my Freeman and Blount.

[doing_it_live]

Wait to see how Blount produces before you trade him away, I think Freeman is the more consistent QB and has only been gaining more confidence each game he plays. IMO Cutler has lost all confidence in himself .

Edited October 28, 2010 by doing_it_live

[Eagles28]

I don't think Lynch is a long-term solution in Seattle. Blount could be a Buc (and a good one) for a long time. Cutler may not be a starter next year the way things are going in Chicago...I'd sit pat probably.

[BearBroncos]

My exact same feeling. Any other opposing view points of this issue?