Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Remember the American middle class?


bpwallace49
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

A quote:

 

American society is more unequal than those in most other OECD countries, and growth in inequality there has been relatively large. But with very few exceptions, the rich have done better over the past 30 years, even in highly egalitarian places like Scandinavia.

 

This suggests that while national factors can influence the degree of inequality growth and can mitigate (or not) the negative impacts of that growth, there seem to be broader, global forces pushing inequality up across countries. The OECD report linked above focuses on a few:

 

Over the past decades, OECD countries have undergone significant structural changes resulting from their closer integration into a global economy and rapid technological progress. These changes have brought higher rewards for high-skilled workers and thus affected the way earnings from work are distributed. The skills gap in earnings reflects several factors. First, a rapid rise in trade and financial markets integration has generated a relative shift in labour demand in favour of high-skilled workers at the expense of low-skilled labour. Second, technical progress has shifted production technologies in both industries and services in favour of skilled labour...

 

Finally, during the past two decades most OECD countries carried out regulatory reforms to strengthen competition in the markets for goods and services and associated reforms that aimed at making labour markets more adaptable. For instance, anti-competitive product-market regulations were reduced significantly in all countries. Employment protection legislation for workers with temporary contracts also became more lenient in many countries. Minimum wages, relative to average wages, have also declined in a number of countries since the 1980s. Wage-setting mechanisms have also changed; the share of union members among workers has fallen across most countries, although the coverage of collective bargaining has generally remained rather stable over time. In a number of countries, unemployment benefit replacement rates fell, and in an attempt to promote employment among low-skilled workers, taxes on labour for low-income workers were also reduced.

 

It's tempting to look at this list of regulatory changes and argue that it was these rule changes which facilitated growth in inequality. That may be true to some extent, but the unverisality of the reform experience makes me think it's at least as likely that underlying trends (like globalisation and technological change) made the prevailing rules unsustainable.

 

In any case, it does seem to me that it's critical to address this issue if popular support for liberal economic activity is to be maintained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I guess this is as good of a place as any...

 

Well, we interviewed 12 people for laborer positions this past Tuesday and actually hired 5 of them. Some of them drove in from as far as North Central Alabama (Huntsville and Fort Payne.) Of the twelve, four were hispanic the balance white. We had a broad range of ages, the youngest being 18, the oldest 54 (neither of them were hired.) We hired two of the hispanics and 3 white guys, the white guys will start at 12 per hour and have NO experience (they'll wash out in about two weeks would be my guess.) The hispanics will start at 14 per hour as they had some experience. I have told 3 of the other applicants to be ready to come to work if they found nothing else as we are not sure the first three will work out and we will be hiring for a crew that will head up to NY from July through Nov/Dec. The other 4 will not be considered, they, knowing it was coming, all failed drug tests... :wacko:

 

There is a silver lining as well. From talking with the two hispanics, it is my understanding that some of their buddies are headed back to the states as they see things beginning to improve. Their friends have experience as iron workers and could hit the ground running. So long as their docs check out I should be able to field the bulk of a crew from these guys and won't have to worry about a high wash out rate with new hires!!!!

 

There was one guy I genuinely felt sorry for. He drove in from Huntsville with his wife and kid, flat ass broke. He is on the call back list, I dropped him a C note for gas back and forth.

 

We aren't outta the woods yet, I gotta find about another $7 mil in contracts to break even, but it looks achievable. Now I've gotta start pulling for the banks to start lending and developers to stop sitting on their hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you still have to interview x number of times a week to remain on gubment help? If so, does the Gubment care that you aren't getting jobs because of failed drug tests to remain on assistance? :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information