DuckSurprise Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 With Holmes out, I luckily snagged Blaylock at the right time but even after last week i'm a little leary of what he might be able to achieve against the Pats. DD seems to be healthy and productive again and even when the Texans are getting killed, he's a big part of their offense. Pittman should be good against the SF run Def but what kind of load is Alstott expected to get? I'm facing a guy who has Mcnabb, Edge, J. Walker amongst others and I need a good stat line from both RB's. If Pittman's just going to get me 70 - 90 yds but get a couple of td's vultured by Alstott then he's no good to me. So, I am most likely going with DD but need help deciding on the other. Anyone? roster in sig line. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuckSurprise Posted November 20, 2004 Author Share Posted November 20, 2004 sorry wrong forum , please ignore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuckSurprise Posted November 20, 2004 Author Share Posted November 20, 2004 made a real mess there by posting in both forums. Sorry about that, got mixed up. Any help appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maddog59 Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 I don't think I'd be afraid of Blaylock. KC seems to perorm well on national TV. They beat the Ravens and Colts. My gut says Blaylock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 Try Blaylock despite the matchup. Tossup between the other 2...similar total yards (edge to Pittman) but a better TD chance for DD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.