colkurtz

I'm sitting Wilson this week. I won't even be mad if he happens to go off on my bench, because there's no way to justify starting him with Boyle at center. "Terrible QB" is an understatement. I agree with this guy.... how did he even make it into the NFL?

(Assuming Walker is out) Charb's matchup is tough. If Seattle is playing catchup all game, he'll probably be a glorified receiver. Ford's matchup is much juicier, but is also splitting with Hunt.

?

I'm 1-3 and going to use my waiver on either the Philly D or Goff. I'm leaning towards Philly because I have Kyler who has been solid so far, and is weeks away from his bye. But Murray been "lucky" to pull out the numbers he has. Would you put more value on Goff (I have no backup QB right now) long-term? Do you think the Eagles will continue to put up big numbers and there's more value there? 12 team Full PPR. My roster if it matters QB: Murray RB: Chubb, Fournette, Hunt, KHerbert, Rachaad White WR: DK, Cooks, Samuel, Robert Woods, Julio DST: Chargers

With Samuel unexpectedly coming off IR, I need to drop someone to make room -- before Sunday. Who would you choose? 12-team full PPR. 1QB/2RB/2WR/1Flex Carr - I have Mahomes so I don't *need* Carr now. Could stream during Mahomes' bye and hope for no injury. But would be possibly helping other teams. Jamaal Williams -- Swift dominating, but Williams still feels flex-able and would be in an excellent spot if Swift has to miss time during season. Pollard -- See Williams above. Christian Kirk - high powered offense, but lots of mouths to feed. Cole Beasley - See Kirk above Fournette - Don't think I can drop him. Brady trusts him and Arians seems to have it out for RoJo. Gaskin - Kicking myself for drafting him, but can't see dropping yet. Rest of my team if it matters: Mamomes, Chubb, Metcalf, Cooks, Marvin Jones, Logan Thomas, Fuller.

A lot of "experts" have Gaskin ranked quite a bit higher than Fournette or Pollard. I'm not so sure, especially with Tua out. Brady seems to trust Fournette. Pollard has been solid, but I'm expecting a dropoff sooner than later. Who would you start?

12-team PPR. Pollard seems flex-able and with upside, but Ingram is getting a lot of touches and maybe the better option in a buy-low situation? My other backs are Chubb, Fournette, Gaskin, Jamaal Williams, Jeff Wilson stashed on IR. His backs are Zeke, Edmonds, David Johnson, Ingram.

Chubb is a beast but can he make up with big runs and TDs his lack of targets in the passing game? Same cost for both.

I'd say Henderson easily Ballage is too good a cuff and as an Ekeler owner myself am worried about reinjury. Gio and Edmonds are at least startable. Don't think I would ever feel good about starting any Rams back this year.

No way the other team is going to give up DK for that deal, but if it's actually on the table hit Yes before he changes his mind.

Currently rolling with Tannehill as my QB1. Have Goff as my backup but Ryan was dropped to waivers this week. Would you prefer Ryan or Goff as your backup/streamer? Goff is consistently mediocre, unlikely to win you game but not likely to lose them either. Ryan has put up a few turds. Looks better with Julio back, but even so would have only had a 16 point day without his rushing TD last week.

2-0-1 tied for first in division. With Mostert coming back soon, would now be a good time to sell McKinnon high for Kelley? I would only have Chubb and Freeman as my other RBs in this scenario, so would be forced to start Freeman in LAC's bye. Not the 1A/1B in LA that many thought it might be initially, but having insurance in a high-powered offense seems desirable, and Kelley might be just as flex-able as McKinnon down the road. My skill positions: Chubb Ekeler McKinnon Freeman Lockett Metcalf Fuller Watkins Cooks Gesicki Team I would be proposing trade has Kamara and Taylor, with Kelley as only backup (Coleman on IR). Thoughts?

I'm constantly surprised why people don't post both rosters in trade questions, given that factors in so much as to whether the trade is a good value or not.

Fuller with an apparent hammy but no injury designation. McKinnon might have backfield to himself with an early lead on the giants, or Shanny might platoon. Leaning Cooks but thinking the others might blow up. Who would you start?

I'd say Kelley. Freeman is high risk/high reward with possibly a flex ceiling behind that line. McKinnon and Davis are short-term values. Kelley got more snaps than Ekeler last week, and was in more on passing downs. Looks like a clear 1A/1B is a good offense with both startable as RB2s.