poor_rich Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 WR's: Holt, Housh, Jennings, Cotchery, Colston and Edwards RB's: C. Williams, Dunn, Dillon, Morency and Bulkhalter Need rb badly 6pts/td 10 yrd/1 pt Which is the more fairer trade. Housh for Maroney or Holt for Maroney??? I need help on this one, thanks. Have a great day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poor_rich Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 This one is a tuffie, it can go either way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chinatown dragons Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 id go for it...tough to give up Holt....but u got some good receivers....tough at RB now...Caddy struggling...think Dunn will put up some yardage,but not many TDs.....Dillon losing carries to Maroney....more explosive back.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poor_rich Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 I can see your point of view on that one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCMB Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 If you can give up Housh instead do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildkat80 Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 I wouldn't do it. You'd be left with one WR stud and a bunch of guys who are decent but they are all untested beyond that (whereas you know Holt will produce). Do you start two RBs? If so then youre not even necessarily upgrading at RB if Cadillac shapes up. Unless it's a keeper league, then maybe go for it. If you can give up Housh instead do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Burgundy Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 Housh for Maroney would be great for you. Not sure I would trade Holt for Maroney. Holt is as proven as it gets for a WR (besides Harrison). Maroney looks great so far, but Dillon will steal some carries and TDs. And who knows how Maroney will hold up in the later weeks of the season? Some rookies tend to break down after weeks 11 & 12, when the college season would've ended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poor_rich Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 first of all, we start 2 rb's, sorry about that. second, I never thought about that, tiring out at the end of the season. Great Point!!!! thirdly, Housh and Maroney can be kept for next year. Holt can't. forthly, I see Westbrook and Green got injury problem. I have both Morency and Bulkhalter, so the urgency may not be so great as I thought it was. But still need to shore it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stranger326 Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 I have Holt, love him but you are deep at WR. If you are in Yahoo you should be starting Colsten at TE (sucks I know). If not I think it is a tough call but may be worth it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poor_rich Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 Tell me about it..in my other league. I wish I could. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Autodrummer Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 I'd do it considering your receiving depth. I think you can count on Jennings and Housh to come through for the rest of the season with good numbers. Luckily, I already have Holt and Maroney. Unfortunately, I also have Caddy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockerbraves Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 No deal. Call me conservative but I would need more than a rookie who shares carries for the likes of a proven point producing veteran such as Holt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.