Codie Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 Tough call, pick any 2 Im leaning toward pittman vs sf Blaylock vs pats opposed to Portis vs philly Mcallister vs den any insight to why not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 Wow. I would pick the complete opposite. Pittman has FIVE TDs in nearly THREE SEASONS for the Bucs. Three of those five TDs came in ONE GAME. He's a yards-only guy. Despite the favorable matchup, I wouldn't start him unless you had worse options. You don't. You have better options. Blaylock ran wild against the Saints. The Pats are NOT the Saints. Temper your expectations this week, even with the skill of the KC O-line. Portis and McCallister are pure studs. Portis is facing a Philly D which is decent, but can be run on. Figure Portis will remain a big part of the offense even with Ramsey starting. And Deuce is a must-start, against any defense. He remains an integral part of the offense despite the score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codie Posted November 21, 2004 Author Share Posted November 21, 2004 Wow. I would pick the complete opposite. Pittman has FIVE TDs in nearly THREE SEASONS for the Bucs. Three of those five TDs came in ONE GAME. He's a yards-only guy. Despite the favorable matchup, I wouldn't start him unless you had worse options. You don't. You have better options. Blaylock ran wild against the Saints. The Pats are NOT the Saints. Temper your expectations this week, even with the skill of the KC O-line. Portis and McCallister are pure studs. Portis is facing a Philly D which is decent, but can be run on. Figure Portis will remain a big part of the offense even with Ramsey starting. And Deuce is a must-start, against any defense. He remains an integral part of the offense despite the score. 567019[/snapback] Thanks I needed that wakeup call, im just getting tired of portis not scoring! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mooker Man Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 Stick with the studs. Portis and McCalister. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtyharry Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 I would start Portis and Duece. Portis is still a top tier RB, he gets every carry and Philly's defensive ranking is in the 20's so they do not dominate teams...Portis will produce. Duece makes the Saint offense and he will get 25-30 carries a game and usually gets 5-7 recepts. Blaylock will put up decent numbers but don't be folled after a big game against the Saints defense. As for Pittman, , I'd use him as a fill-in/injury substitute only. Never bench your studs and Portis and Duece are studs. Good luck Please see my post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codie Posted November 21, 2004 Author Share Posted November 21, 2004 I would start Portis and Duece. Portis is still a top tier RB, he gets every carry and Philly's defensive ranking is in the 20's so they do not dominate teams...Portis will produce. Duece makes the Saint offense and he will get 25-30 carries a game and usually gets 5-7 recepts. Blaylock will put up decent numbers but don't be folled after a big game against the Saints defense. As for Pittman, , I'd use him as a fill-in/injury substitute only. Never bench your studs and Portis and Duece are studs. Good luck Please see my post 567041[/snapback] Thanks for the input Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.