Team Position Ranks (defense)

[Brentastic]

It may sound minor, but logically it makes much more sense to have it set up like last year, having the easiest defenses listed at the top. 90% of fantasy points come from offensive production, so IMO, the defensive should be listed worst-first with worst=1. I know it may seem like I'm nit-picking, but when you're looking for easy defenses to matchup against, it's much more user-friendly to see the list worst-first/top-bottom. I realize I can just look at the list from the bottom up, I just don't like it nor do I understand the reason for the change this year.

[WJW]

Actually, last year's never made sense to me and it was very confusing to many of our members. Now they do make sense IMO. If I want to know the worst defense for my fantasy team to go against at a position I find the one ranked 32nd, last. Worst = last, best = first. Seems logical to me.

[Brentastic]

IMO it makes more sense to list the favorable matchups first, not the other way around, because, like I said earlier, most FF points come from offensive production, not defensive production. It surprises me that most people were confused by last year's format. I would imagine most people, including myself, use the defense rankings to see which of their players have easy matchups or which FA I might pickup because of an easy matchup. How does that not make sense?

 

Sincerely,

Logic Guru