brighton boys Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 My roster is in my sig. As you can see I have no depth at WR. I have been offered I.Bruce for M.Barber which doesn't seem like a bad deal for me. Should I expect more for Barber? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Burgundy Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 With Ronnie Brown's groin injury, I think I would stick w/ Barber. I'd rather have no depth at WR than no depth at RB. If Brown ever went down, you'd be done to just 2 RBs. I don't think Bruce is enough to take that chance. See mine if you get a chance. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gros Membres! Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 Barber has been promised to get more run by Parcells and he's been a TD machine. I don't think you can let him go for Bruce. would look for a WR a step up to even consider it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Pimp Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 Stick with Barber. Please reply to my post here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockerbraves Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 My roster is in my sig. As you can see I have no depth at WR. I have been offered I.Bruce for M.Barber which doesn't seem like a bad deal for me. Should I expect more for Barber? If you consider Barber as your RB4 I might make this trade if there is no WR's on waivers as decent as Bruce. As a Plaxico owner I know you must be having some problems in your WR corps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.