thehitman23 Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 I am solid at Running Backs with Henry, Rudi Johnson and Willie Parker with Kevin Jones and Lamont Jordan as my back ups. My wide receivers suck! Boldin Santonio Holmes and Edwards are my starters...YUCK!!!!!! We start 2 RB's 3WR's and a flex I have offered Henry or Rudi for Holt, and the owner is mulling it over but has asked if he can get Willie Parker. He has TO on his team. Is the better trade Holt for either Henry or Rudi or trade Willie Parker for TO. It is not a Points per Reception league. TD's worth 6, 10 yards rushing/receiving per point any help would be appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchurdaughters Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 I favor getting TO for fast Willie....but thats just me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 Neither trade is good. Seems like you are panicking about your WRs when they are fine. You have 3 legit RBs and 3 legit WRs in a league where you must start 6 of them. I guess since you can go 2/4 you're still going a starter for starter trade, but even so I think I'd rather have the solid RBs and depth at the RB spot with solid WRs then give up the RB depth for a WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehitman23 Posted September 12, 2007 Author Share Posted September 12, 2007 I don't think Edwards or Clayton can be counted on for consistent points each week. Also, if Lamont Jordan or Kevin Jones pans out, then I will just be wasting those points on my bench Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 I don't think Edwards or Clayton can be counted on for consistent points each week. Also, if Lamont Jordan or Kevin Jones pans out, then I will just be wasting those points on my bench As long as you have quality starters, which you do, better those points on your bench than in your opponents lineup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehitman23 Posted September 12, 2007 Author Share Posted September 12, 2007 Isnt it better to improve a position, Edwards to either Holt or Owens, and use the points on the bench. Essentially which is better: Braylon Edwards and Henry, Johnson, Parker Owens and Henry, Johnson and Lamont Jordan Holt and Henry, Parker and Lamont Jordan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehitman23 Posted September 12, 2007 Author Share Posted September 12, 2007 he is also willing to exchange Benson for Clayton in the trade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 In that case, I'd do Clayton and one of those RBs for Benson and the stud WR, whichever you prefer. You essentially upgrade at WR at little to no cost at RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.