estriz69 Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 Would anyone consider making this move? I'm not that impressed with McNabb this year and feel that Hackett has a much better chance of scoring on a consistent basis then Curtis. If you disagree then please tell me why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mags Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 I agree, McNabb has not been impressive this year, but once Branch gets back next week, Seattle will have a number of options to go to at the Receiver position and I am just not that strong of a believer in their passing attack or offense right now. I would probably stick with Curtis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boltnlava Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 Hackett may be limited in gametime reps due to his conditioning. Curtis plays all game long. Mc Nabb doesn't seem like the Qb he could be but he does get the ball to wide recievers. This is a close one...I'd go with Curtis as hassellback isn't setting the world on fire either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF409ers Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 I did this morning. Hackett will be in "game shape" soon enough and I like Seattle's EOS the rest of the season much better. Outside of one big play in week 6 and the week 3 phenomenon he has not done much at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boltnlava Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 I agree, McNabb has not been impressive this year, but once Branch gets back next week, Seattle will have a number of options to go to at the Receiver position and I am just not that strong of a believer in their passing attack or offense right now. I would probably stick with Curtis. totally agree here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ffjunky Posted November 7, 2007 Share Posted November 7, 2007 Curtis has absolutely killed fantasy owners who have started him this year. Despite being one of the top point scorers, he isn't even in the top 40 in the NFL in "quality starts." If you want a complete breakdown of these numbers check out my blog in my signature. Curtis for anyone is fine by me. Hackett has some potential. I prefer Shaun McDonald and Reggie Williams to Hackett, however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
estriz69 Posted November 8, 2007 Author Share Posted November 8, 2007 Anyone else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirtdickens Posted November 8, 2007 Share Posted November 8, 2007 Hackett, for sure. He and Engram will score points even when Branch comes back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.