SpinalTapp Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Whenever I see a story about Forsett, I read that he is either (1) poised for a takeover in Seattle or (2) built like a scat back and destined to be a third down player only. Where is the truth? Insiders, homers, shed some light up in here for a brother. Need to figure out if this guy is worth picking up if I have to cut Sims-Walker. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAIDER209NATION Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Well i just picked him up today. I like what hes done with the playing time hes recieved. Im planning on stashing him on my bench. If he works out great, if not oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 last years scat back that was too small to be a feature back was Steve Slaton. Soo . . . . i hope this is a redraft, cause the second year looks kinda rocky . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks21 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Forsett doesn't have featured back potential. He is effective when the team is way behind and the opposing teams aren't afraid to give him room to roam. The Seahawks will use his quickness on a handful of specialty plays, nothing more. As opposed to other other scat-backs, Forsett only runs 4.7-4.8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.