Perchoutofwater Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 ....that she's a man? Sadly, it's true. Well more manly than someone that drives a Prius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Lawyers, please correct me: I thought the constitution did not mandate what the government could do, but rather, stated what it could NOT do. Is my understanding wrong? the 10th amendment would be relevant...."The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." but your understanding it still sorta right, because the branches of government have so completely neutered the 10th amendment that it is basically left with no real legal effect whatsoever. it's in there, and it's pretty clear cut in what it says, it's just that nobody in government really cares Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 What function do they server? What are they constitutionally mandated to do? I would bet dollars to donuts that if she had no staff and did nothing, you'd be calling her a lazy feckless welfare queen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I would bet dollars to donuts that if she had no staff and did nothing, you'd be calling her a lazy feckless welfare queen. sad but true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I would bet dollars to donuts that if she had no staff and did nothing, you'd be calling her a lazy feckless welfare queen. You'd lose, but you know that. I'm sure you feel better for your bout of hyperbole though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts