Strange Keeper Rule

[cpeltz]

We have a strange 1 player keeper rule, where if a player is drafted mid-late rounds last year, he can be kept giving up a 3rd round slot.

 

I have a top 10 RB that I'm keeping and I draft in the #4 position this year. The safe choice would probably be to draft one of the top 4 RB's in round one and follow with a WR, but our league (not PPR) is QB-happy, and I feel like I'll be playing catchup and not have any elite players if I go that route. There's even the chance that a QB will be gone in the first 3 picks (last year there were 2 QB's drafted in EACH of the first 5 rounds).

 

Am thinking about taking a QB in round 1 and the best available WR/RB in round 2. Stupid?

[Big Country]

Probably stupid, but lineup reqs (start 2 QBs?) or scoring rules (absurdly high QB scoring in relation to other positions?) could sway that.

[jetsfan]

Probably stupid, but lineup reqs (start 2 QBs?) or scoring rules (absurdly high QB scoring in relation to other positions?) could sway that.

 

We have a start 2 QB league and all of the top tier QBs were gone in the first two rounds.

[Big Country]

We have a start 2 QB league and all of the top tier QBs were gone in the first two rounds.

 

This generally makes sense for start 2 QB leagues. QB values soar in start 2 QB leagues or in leagues where QBs are flex eligible, assuming most "standard' scoring (1 per 25 passing, 4 pt pass TD, 1 per 10 rush/rec, 6 pt rush/rec TD)

[cpeltz]

Nope, it's a start 1 QB. I'm just struggling in the mocks. If I go RB, I'm golden at that position, but playing catch-up every place else. Looks like my best bet is RB/WR/RB then see where the value is at QB/WR.

 

Thanks.