SEC=UGA Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 I agree the DOJ needs to serve a more proper purpose, like they did a few short years ago I remember the outrage and everyone here prattling on about the Constitution then like they do now, or maybe I don't. Yo asked us to not dooosh up this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEC=UGA Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 This is a no chivesing zone. I'll let you off with a warning.... this time. Next time, the last thing you'll remember is TimC's soft, soft hands covering your face with an ether-soaked rag. Fond, fond, memories they will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 (edited) Yo asked us to not dooosh up this thread. bushwacked unilaterally decided that such a request was unconstitutionally discriminatory against bushwacked as a protected chives class. Edited February 25, 2011 by Azazello1313 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Square Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 (edited) So IF a judge rules it unconstitutional, the DOJ will not repeal it. Isn't that the main point? I think some of you are getting hung up on the words Obama rules unconstitutional. In a statement, Attorney General Eric Holder said, “After careful consideration, including a review of my recommendation, the president has concluded that, given a number of factors, including a documented history of discrimination, classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny.” This means that the administration will withdraw its defense of ongoing suits in two federal Appeals Courts and will leave it to Congress to defend the law, known as DOMA, against those challenges. It will remain a party to the lawsuits as the law itself remains in effect. Old joke: Why not let the gheys get married? Let them be miserable like the rest of us. (ba doomp) Edited February 25, 2011 by Square Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 Yo asked us to not dooosh up this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 bushwacked unilaterally decided that such a request was unconstitutionally discriminatory against bushwacked as a protected chives class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.