hooknladder Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 (edited) I guess I am seeing it a bit different. My main point is this enables someone to retire earlier if they have the ability to double dip and by retiring earlier the state pays more years of a pension where they would not have to if double dipping was not a factor. That is all I am trying to say. your actually wrong. he's earned his pension either way. pay him his salary or pay him his pension...-does'nt matter. the new guy will require training and benefits (which the old guy does not) and will quickly catch up in pay. you and others have made false statements regarding pensions. it seems silly to get all worked up over something without having a clear understanding of the facts. Edited April 9, 2011 by hooknladder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.