Wejizle007 Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 10 team .5 PPR I am strong at both positions so either would just bump a lesser guy to my flex. Is foster and gordon better than Thomas? Den offense is so strong. Can foster hold up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basket018 Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 i stay put... but what is th rest of your team? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpr103 Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Agreed. You know what you got with Demaryius. No so much for the rest of the season and Gordon who hasn't played in 10 months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gallagorilla Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 going into playoffs id rather have foster/gordon, but does depend on the rest of your team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Fletcher Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Again, it depends on your team, but Foster and Gordon would be awesome for the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdybaz Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Just on the surface I would take Foster & Gordon. Foster has been great, and Gordon has been able to be with the team, so he won't be coming into this completely cold in a couple of weeks, and he's the only show in town, as opposed to Demaryius who has to share the ball with numerous receivers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmcjhi Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 As a rule, I'd rather have the #2 WR than the #2 RB due to the high injury likelihood with RBs. This is particularly true with Foster. Gordon is too much of an questionmark at this point. Depending on how your and his teams look, I would counter with Demaryius and one of your better bench players for Foster and a good WR2 like K. Benjamin, Sanders, S. Smith, etc. so you don't lose too much at WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robotpimp Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 I like it, but I take risks I see that Foster seems so consistent and his potential is very good to get a lot of points weekly, adding Gordon even with a lot of questions about how he'll come back doesn't worry me that guy is an elite WR regardless. If you're strong at both positions you're getting two for one, DT can get injured too once he's gone the Gordon insurance policy is as well. DT and Foster are elite scoring threats. you could go either way with it, staying with DT is definitely safe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacks29 Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 I would do it. I think they're both in the same place as far as their positions go. I think it's a fair trade straight up. Throwing Gordon is just a bonus. The only worry with Foster is he's more likely to get hurt. At least you know Foster will get his points every week, Thomas could easily have a down week if Manning decides to throw to Sanders or Julius Thomas all day. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.