Steelhead Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 We are half ppr league. My QB is Tannehill and I’ve been offered Aaron Rodgers and a WR for AP and Landry. Not going to do that but the Rodgers owner is really hurting at RB and WR. I was thinking of Forsett/Martin and Garcon for Rodgers but is Rodgers going to be that much better to take a step down at WR3 and RB2. Forsett hasn’t done anything better than Martin at this point though. I’m thinking of just staying put but would like some other thoughts. My Team Tannehill, Foles Peterson, Forsett, Doug Martin, David Johnson (or whatever waiver wire RB I get tonight) Calvin, Landry, Garcon, Randle, Agholor Reed, Ertz His Team Rodgers, Palmer Jennings, Crowell, Spiller, Karlos Williams TY, Cooks, Wallace, Tavon, Austin, Quick Bennett, Maxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn5033 Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 You can try but I don't think your going to get Rodgers for that. Rodgers is pretty much a guaranteed 20+ pts a week. Forsett has less than 20pts in the 1st 2 weeks combined, same as Martin. And Garcon is a WR3 maybe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwillMerchants Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 I don't think you can give up AP and I don't think you'll get him for that offer. You may be stuck with what you have. Check out mine http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?/topic/445031-1-waiver-claim-who-do-you-take/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelhead Posted September 22, 2015 Author Share Posted September 22, 2015 and I am ok with what I have. As I said I don't know that my net gains would be that much better week in week out. I am not going to send AP and Landry so if he's that desperate he should bite on my other guys...or just stand pat I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelhead Posted September 22, 2015 Author Share Posted September 22, 2015 He now asked for Landry and Garcon which would decimate my WRs. I think I would need Hilton in return or Wallace at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike43StlCrtn Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 I think your team is solid. Any fair trade for Rodgers would hurt your team more I think. Tannehill will be 15-20 weekly. Landry is your most consisten with Megatron as your biggest upside. No AP, and your RBs would be crushed. I like David Johnson, but never been a believer in Forsett. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn5033 Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 This guy is willing to give you Rodgers for Landry and Garcon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike43StlCrtn Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Landry and Garcon?? I didn't see that before. In a heartbeat, but if you have a decent league they'll veto that. Ridiculously lopsided. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelhead Posted September 22, 2015 Author Share Posted September 22, 2015 This guy is willing to give you Rodgers for Landry and Garcon? Yeah he just texted saying maybe he'd do Landry and Garcon. I'd keep my RBs, upgrade from Tannehill to Rodgers, and Downgrade WR2 and WR3 from Landry and Garcon to Randle and Agholor or whatever I could pick up off waivers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn5033 Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 I don't see how you can pass on that. Make the trade and then work on improving your WR's again. Hit the wire and see what is out there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.