Randall Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 Donovan owner has Brees, Favre and McNabb and offered me him for Onterrio because he needs RB's. Offered him earlier Hines for Brees but he turned it down. Will this be vetoed? My team Griese/Rattay/now McNabb Ahman/Blaylock/Duce Ward/Plex/Lelie/Wade Witten Elam/Graham Jets/Bills His team Favre/Brees Dillon/George/Goings/Onterrio/A Train Bennet/Coles/R Wayne/Kennison Wiggins Carney PH/Skins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWP 45 Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 Shouldn't be vetoed although you got the better of the trade. A top tier QB is equal to a second tier RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maddog59 Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 I wouldn't vote to veto it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shotgun Messiahs Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 Donovan owner has Brees, Favre and McNabb and offered me him for Onterrio because he needs RB's. Offered him earlier Hines for Brees but he turned it down. Will this be vetoed? My team Griese/Rattay/now McNabb Ahman/Blaylock/Duce Ward/Plex/Lelie/Wade Witten Elam/Graham Jets/Bills His team Favre/Brees Dillon/George/Goings/Onterrio/A Train Bennet/Coles/R Wayne/Kennison Wiggins Carney PH/Skins 567908[/snapback] Why would it? The trade brings balance to both teams! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted November 21, 2004 Author Share Posted November 21, 2004 Why would it? The trade brings balance to both teams! 567925[/snapback] Thanks. Started out the year with McNabb and Gannon. Nice to have a healthy QB for a change going into the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickerson Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 It should not be vetoed - i got mcnabb for mewelde moore when he had the starting job, so if i can get him for moore, you can certainly get himm for smith. same exact situation, as the mcnabb owner had brees as his #2 as well. should not be a problem for you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runner Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 No collusion = No veto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onbrake Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 No trade should ever be vetoed unless there is clear evidence that some illegall activity is going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutrun Jellies Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 Why would it? The trade brings balance to both teams! 567925[/snapback] AMEN !! This is more of a key to evaluating trades than soooo many people realize. In this situation, this trade works well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.