Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Super Bowl Pool Question


gcs
 Share

Recommended Posts

For Super Bowl XXXIX, we have New England and Philadelphia. Our first block of squares will be for the quarterbacks, Tom Brady of the Patriots and the Eagles' Donovan McNabb. This pool is based on the length of any TD pass or run by the QBs. For example, you might buy a square that places you at "McNabb 4, Brady 8." So, if Donovan McNabb throws a 24-yard TD pass, you just cashed in. If the pool is worth, say, $100... make each TD worth $10 until the $100 is exhausted. Or, you can award only one score per quarter - the first score of each quarter counts - with the fourth quarter being worth $40 (or $20 and save the last $20 in case there is overtime).

 

Can someone please explain how you would set this up? I think the thing that is tripping me up is wouldn't you have multiple squares with 'McNabb 4'? Or am I just missing the point? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be setup exactly the same way as a traditional pool except you substitute McNabb and Brady in in place of the Eagles and Pats.  Then the payout is based on the length of a TD rather than the score.  Does this make more sense?

 

684720[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

So my point is that if you do it this way and McNabb runs it in from 4 yards out that would mean the 10 squares under 'McNabb 4/Brady 0-9' would win. Wouldn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So my point is that if you do it this way and McNabb runs it in from 4 yards out that would mean the 10 squares under 'McNabb 4/Brady 0-9' would win.  Wouldn't it?

 

684922[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

That's the way it looks to me. It seems to be very confusing and there is no set # of TD's either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So my point is that if you do it this way and McNabb runs it in from 4 yards out that would mean the 10 squares under 'McNabb 4/Brady 0-9' would win.  Wouldn't it?

 

684922[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

You're right......I want a refund for this horrible advise! :D

No really, I like the idea, it just needs more refining.

Edited by Pancake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information