SMW Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 (edited) Julius Jones & Chris Henry for Lamont Jordan & Roy Williams. I'm not one of the trading parties involved, so i'm not sure of the thinking involved with either team. The guy who traded away Jordan & Roy Williams is famous for getting fleeced in deals. The commish is bringing this trade to a veto vote among the other league members. Opinions? Edited October 3, 2006 by SMW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearcatGreg Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 One sided trade IMO, but if you can't prove collusion then let it happen. Next, get rid of the guy if he keeps making dumb trades that hurt the overall league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 The trade is kinda retarded. but if you guys do not believe it is collusion then nothing you can do. Next year you might want to tell the guy who is always getting fleeced that maybe fantasy football is not for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew70 Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 I agree with the above. If no collusion, then the trade should stand. Then someone needs to politely tell the guy who gets fleeced to kindly get a clue or move along. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildkat80 Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 There's a difference between a bad trade and a veto-able trade. This may be bad, but in my opinion is not even close to veto-able. I agree with the above. If no collusion, then the trade should stand. Then someone needs to politely tell the guy who gets fleeced to kindly get a clue or move along. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.