Bronco Billy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Not whining. Pointing out. Are you saying that Woodson didn't affect Hester????? Much more important non call than the "phantom" hold.I will not spend my time in a pissing match with you Billy. I've been around here a long time and your reputation preceeds you. So Woodson has inside leverage and position, Hester runs him over, and that's PI against Woodson in your mind? I don't blame you for not wanting to discuss it, and it is pretty amusing to see you duck behind a skirt and fix the blame on me for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 So Woodson has inside leverage and position, Hester runs him over, and that's PI against Woodson in your mind? I don't blame you for not wanting to discuss it, and it is pretty amusing to see you duck behind a skirt and fix the blame on me for it. You must have a different tv if you think that's what happened. Like I said no arguing with you. There are plenty of 5 y.o. s out there. Let go of your moms skirt and see if she will let you watch your imaginary television some more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I will not spend my time in a pissing match with you Billy. I've been around here a long time and your reputation preceeds you. All evidence to the contrary You must have a different tv if you think that's what happened. Like I said no arguing with you. There are plenty of 5 y.o. s out there. Let go of your moms skirt and see if she will let you watch your imaginary television some more. Funny to see you think yourself so above me and then resort to this. Hell, you couldn't even be original there and had to go to the skirt reference right after I used it. Go find yourself a superbar. have a few Old Styles, and get over that your Bears were damned lucky to finish within 10 pts of GB. 2 yards rushing by RBs? In a whole game? Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 All evidence to the contrary Funny to see you think yourself so above me and then resort to this. Hell, you couldn't even be original there and had to go to the skirt reference right after I used it. Go find yourself a superbar. have a few Old Styles, and get over that your Bears were damned lucky to finish within 10 pts of GB. 2 yards rushing by RBs? In a whole game? Really? Never said the Bears were even good and I don't drink. Especially not Mold Pile. Go Broncos. How's orton and rev. Tebow workin out. I will try my hardest to ignore you from here on. Are you a Packer fan as well? Go ahead and make one more pointless post. I'm going to go ask Grits how to "ignore all posts" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsosi Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 there is a youtube video that shows the hold. It may be a ticky-tack call, but its certainly not 'phantom' video: pic: http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LwJU7zZkwJo/0.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 there is a youtube video that shows the hold. It may be a ticky-tack call, but its certainly not 'phantom' video: pic: http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LwJU7zZkwJo/0.jpg Agreed. Not Phantom but overzealous call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Go ahead and make one more pointless post. I'm going to go ask Grits how to "ignore all posts" More originality I see. Why don't you also ask waterman how to be completely irrelvant? Oh, wait, you've got that part figured out. Nevermind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 More originality I see. Why don't you also ask waterman how to be completely irrelvant? Oh, wait, you've got that part figured out. Nevermind. I can't compare with your originality(or your t.v.'s for that matter). Sorry I'm on the wrong board. THIS IS THE ORIGINALITY BOARD! Have a challenged day "Bronco". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I can't compare with your originality(or your t.v.'s for that matter). Sorry I'm on the wrong board. THIS IS THE ORIGINALITY BOARD! Have a challenged day "Bronco". You ought to check out the Vick threads. You could get some pointers on making up excuses. You've got the whining part nailed, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 You ought to check out the Vick threads. You could get some pointers on making up excuses. You've got the whining part nailed, though. I would think you would be a Vick apologist since you seem to be cut from the same cloth. IQ wise. Oh sorry is that whining? Moran. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Agreed. Not Phantom but overzealous call. Why, because the Bear's player, in the middle of the field where everyone could see him alone with the gunner, decided to grab the jersey of the GB gunner from behind? Cmon dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I would think No, you wouldn't - or don't, is more accurate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Why, because the Bear's player, in the middle of the field where everyone could see him alone with the gunner, decided to grab the jersey of the GB gunner from behind? Cmon dude. He actually was pulling him towards the trick play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 No, you wouldn't - or don't, is more accurate. Don't you have gym class right about now. Make a point not try to personally attack. No wonder you lead the list of irritating idiots on these boards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 He actually was pulling him towards the trick play. I thought you stated he wasn't holding. Now you're claiming that the holding was actually aiding the Packer? You really are a piece of work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I've been sucked into the waste of time I've always avoided here. Everyone is right except little Billy. Now I'm done with this ref sh*t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I've been sucked into the waste of time I've always avoided here. Everyone is right except little Billy. Now I'm done with this ref sh*t. You mean, avoided since yesterday? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I love how he said he's not going to get into a pissing match ... and then proceeded to unzip his fly and take a long piss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bankerboy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 You guys are missing the most obvious answer.... It took the refs a year...but they finally evened out the Calvin Johnson "no-TD' catch against the Bears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 You mean, avoided since yesterday? That was just for fun as stated before. besides posts on the same subject, in the same thread are all related, like you and lil' Billy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 That was just for fun as stated before. besides posts on the same subject, in the same thread are all related, like you and lil' Billy. Don't pretend to compare yourself to det. He may be wrong almost all the time, but at least his positions have foundation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 1.) He grabbed the guys jersey. That was holding on the punt return 2.) Hester, while not looking where he was going, ran directly into Woodson. That was a good non-call and clearly incidental contact. Even Chicago sports radio isnt upset about that call. 3.) Peppers was out of bounds and did NOT have possession. yet teh Bears got the call. stop yer whining snowbound . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 That was just for fun as stated before. besides posts on the same subject, in the same thread are all related, like you and lil' Billy. Glad you cleared that up. Oh, and you nailed it, Bronco and I are fast friends. We pretty much agree on everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Glad you cleared that up. Oh, and you nailed it, Bronco and I are fast friends. We pretty much agree on everything. Sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 1.) He grabbed the guys jersey. That was holding on the punt return 2.) Hester, while not looking where he was going, ran directly into Woodson. That was a good non-call and clearly incidental contact. Even Chicago sports radio isnt upset about that call. 3.) Peppers was out of bounds and did NOT have possession. yet teh Bears got the call. stop yer whining snowbound . . . . I never whined. Since when is stating that you disagree with a call whining. F Billy the trouble maker. Chicago sports radio just knows, like me, that none of this really matters. Just really stating a poorly officiated game. Bears have serious issues. Tell me you are at least listening to the Score????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.