anismith Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 (edited) I recently traded an RB desperate team (one of their starting RB's is terrance west in a 10 team league): Ryan Mathews, Decker, and Sims for OBJ + Arian Foster. I know I got a reasonably good deal there, but should this have been vetoed? Because it was. Edited September 25, 2016 by anismith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aknaub333 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Seems like a balanced package to me. Your comish might be abusing their power Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mow7 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Seems like a fair deal if the other team was in need of RBs and OBJ hasn't lived up to his draft position through the first 2 weeks so you are kind of buying low. People are just hating because you are getting Beckham Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gronk87 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Too much for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gronk87 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Too much for Beckham. Decker is playing lights out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn5033 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 No, it should not have been vetoed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8rattoon Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Too much for Beckham right now. But once Martin returns, this looks a little more fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anismith Posted September 25, 2016 Author Share Posted September 25, 2016 Too much for Beckham right now. But once Martin returns, this looks a little more fair lol. I think they vetoed it because I was getting too much not vice versa... I have too many RB's and this other person has not enough. Perfect example of when both teams can benefit from a trade. I have Forte, Ingram, Cj, and Tevin Coleman. I hate crybaby vetos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julio think u are? Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Is the system league votes for veto? Or commish?It really should be the commish who decides, and you should have a commish that doesn't veto anything.This definitely should not have been vetoed. It's a good trade for you, and a good trade for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anismith Posted September 25, 2016 Author Share Posted September 25, 2016 (edited) Is the system league votes for veto? Or commish? It really should be the commish who decides, and you should have a commish that doesn't veto anything. This definitely should not have been vetoed. It's a good trade for you, and a good trade for him. Apparently the other owner claimed that he hit the trade button by accident and then they vetoed it--I just found this out now. I think this is even worse...I guess I am playing with children rather than adults who can be trusted to make actual decisions. I now understand the "no veto" crowd a bit more than I did previously. I think vetos should only happen in cases where you can't even come up with a story about how it could improve both teams. Edited September 25, 2016 by anismith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julio think u are? Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 (edited) Apparently the other owner claimed that he hit the trade button by accident and then they vetoed it--I just found this out now. I think this is even worse...I guess I am playing with children rather than adults who can be trusted to make actual decisions. I now understand the "no veto" crowd a bit more than I did previously. I think vetos should only happen in cases where you can't even come up with a story about how it could improve both teams. That's awful! These are people you know and are friends with? Lol I found that too. You don't really understand why people are so against veto until it happens to you. Edited September 25, 2016 by Julio think u are? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anismith Posted September 25, 2016 Author Share Posted September 25, 2016 That's awful! These are people you know and are friends with? Lol I found that too. You don't really understand why people are so against veto until it happens to you. Yeah, I think vetos still need to exist, but this is crazy. This is not people I know, it's random strangers and I think a lot of them happen to be friends. Last year I'll be in this league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XFlash Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Well, make it easy for them if it was 'accidental' click. Resubmit trade again. Also, ask Commish why it was vetoed. He should have a read on the sentiment of the league complaints. If vetoed again, readjust and resubmit. I hate it also when those afraid to trade complain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jweed Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 I would NOT veto the trade. It should not have been vetoed in my opinion as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.