Kicker22 Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 I have just been offered Bettis and Dilfer for SDavis. The guy offering it is 4-1-1 and in first and I am 4-2 and in second to him in our 5 team divion, part of a 10 team performance scoring league with reception bonuses. We have split the only two games we will play each other this year and would not see each other until the Super Bowl. My roster is as follows. McNabb Brunnell Griese (Have an IR move to P/U QB) LT Anderson SDavis Perry Benson Holt JSmith Branch Lloyd Coles Booker He has several players I would be interested in Brady McGahee Priest Martin Boldin Galloway I thought about counter offering McNabb SDavis for Brady McGahee or SDavis Coles/ Booker/ Lloyd for Bettis Galloway Waht do you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Rugby Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 You are thin at RB and solid at QB so the first trade is not a good one. I would avoid getting Bettis. The RBBC that Pitt has makes him less valuable. I like the McNabb/Davis for Brady/McGahee. Willis is getting a big boost with Holcomb throwing the ball. Teams cannot just try to shut down the run anymore. He will be solid the rest of the season and you can ride the Brunnell train as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhoops Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 I agree, the 1st trade doesn't make sense, granted Bettis will be getting more touches per Cower but it is still RBBC. The 3rd trade doesn't do it for me either. I like the second, even Brady/Martin would work as well. Good Luck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gdawg Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 Ditto everything Phat Rugby said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kicker22 Posted October 19, 2005 Author Share Posted October 19, 2005 I agree, the 1st trade doesn't make sense, granted Bettis will be getting more touches per Cower but it is still RBBC. The 3rd trade doesn't do it for me either. I like the second, even Brady/Martin would work as well. Good Luck! 1081317[/snapback] Brady and Martin I do not think is enough...if it was not for that on e crap game McNabb is by far better than Brady, but I think I could do this McNabb SDavis Coles Brady Martin Galloway What do you think of that...mind you QB's do not hold alot of value in our league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Rugby Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 Brady and Martin I do not think is enough...if it was not for that on e crap game McNabb is by far better than Brady, but I think I could do this McNabb SDavis Coles Brady Martin Galloway What do you think of that...mind you QB's do not hold alot of value in our league. 1081332[/snapback] That would be a solid move, but I don't think he will take it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kicker22 Posted October 19, 2005 Author Share Posted October 19, 2005 That would be a solid move, but I don't think he will take it. 1081402[/snapback] If I offered just McNabb and Davis am I getting enough in CuMar and Brady in return if I do not throw in the WR's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kicker22 Posted October 19, 2005 Author Share Posted October 19, 2005 Bump! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kicker22 Posted October 20, 2005 Author Share Posted October 20, 2005 Bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.