Coltsbus1 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 My RB's are E. James, K. Jones, C. Benson, C. Perry...T. Fisher is availble in FA...My WR's are D. Driver, T.J. Houshamazdah, D. Mason, A-Zahir Hakim and K. Curtis.... Should I make the trade for Parker? I know Bruce will be back soon... and Edge is on a bye.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admtahoe Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 NO Why would the Parker owner want a #3 receiver for a top 15 back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltsbus1 Posted October 26, 2005 Author Share Posted October 26, 2005 I was offered Parker... I think it is a no brainer... and Curtis is 12th in WR points .... Not a #3 WR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admtahoe Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Curtis isn't the #3 receiver? I think you should check your facts and look at the Team Depth Chart It is Holt, Bruce then Curtis and McDonald here is the link http://www.stlouisrams.com/team/depthcharts/ Curtis only has good fantasy numbers because Bruce has been out a few weeks. Once Bruce comes back, Curtis will see a decrease in receptions and plays. Your post did not say you were receiving or giving parker. I thought you were offering curtis for parker. So if the other owner is such a moron, then yes take parker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emandg Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 If that trades waiting to be accepted I would take it ASAP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltsbus1 Posted October 26, 2005 Author Share Posted October 26, 2005 You can't call a guy a #3 receiver if he is #12th in WR points... I understand your point for depth chart, but Bruce has turf toe... and we all know how long that will linger...Holt is injured...You can't call a guy a #3 WR when injuries determine where they are currently on the depth chart.... Right now Curtis is a low #1 or a high #2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admtahoe Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 You can't call a guy a #3 receiver if he is #12th in WR points... I understand your point for depth chart, but Bruce has turf toe... and we all know how long that will linger...Holt is injured...You can't call a guy a #3 WR when injuries determine where they are currently on the depth chart.... Right now Curtis is a low #1 or a high #2 1099835[/snapback] Yeah ok you win If Curtis is so great then you should keep him. Just trying to give my opinion but since you seem to ask for opinions and then tell me I'm wrong, well, good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rileyrott Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Yeah ok you win If Curtis is so great then you should keep him. Just trying to give my opinion but since you seem to ask for opinions and then tell me I'm wrong, well, good luck. 1099880[/snapback] SMACK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.